Quantcast
Channel: RD Laing | The Guardian
Viewing all 64 articles
Browse latest View live

Letters: RD Laing and psychiatry

$
0
0
I am moved to write in response to Michael Billington's article (Out and about, G2, March 23) in which he comments on the 30-minute documentary about RD Laing on show at the ICA's Beck's Futures exhibition.

Towards the end of his piece, Billington writes: "I've no idea if Laing's ideas still influence psychiatry but few theorists since Freud and Marx have left such a big imprint on the arts."

On March 5, the Royal College of Psychiatry and the Philadelphia Association, established by Laing and others in 1965 out of concern for the treatment of emotional suffering, held the third RD Laing conference at SOAS, which was attended by some 120 psychiatrists and psychotherapists.

The enormous changes in psychiatric practice since the 60s must be acknowledged. Then, Laing and others criticised the widespread use of ECT and lobotomies as well as the paternalistic attitude towards patients.

Current practice, such as service-user involvement in care planning, owes something to Laing's influence. But Laing's central concern with respectful listening within the client-practitioner relationship still has force. It underpins the philosophy of the Philadelphia Association, in which Laing's voice remains potently present.
Lucy King
Philadelphia Association


guardian.co.uk© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Clancy Sigal: A trip to the far side of madness

$
0
0

When Clancy Sigal first met soon-to-be 'celebrity shrink' RD Laing in the 1960s, he was like a breath of fresh air. But then Sigal broke down, and Laing reneged on a solemn promise ...

Scene: a dark shaded consulting room on the ground floor of 21 Wimpole Street, London W1. Time: early 1960s. This is my first session with the up-and- coming "celebrity shrink", Dr Ronald D Laing. I've run through half a dozen therapists who either call me names ("You're unanalysable, dear man") or recommend electroshock therapy (at Maudsley hospital) or advise me to quit writing if it's so painful.

Laing is a breath of fresh air. He is about my age (mid-30s), irreparably handsome with the doomed beauty of a haunted artist, and from a similar slum background. He speaks my language, or so it seems. Later, it turns out he is fashionably downgrading his Presbyterian middle-class origins in Glasgow.

Smoking a thin cigar, he leans forward intently in his cracked-leather chair and examines me through half-lidded eyes. "What are ye fookin' around wi' all that neurotic shit for, Clancy?" he says in a Scottish accent I am to learn he can put on or off at will. "Tummy aches and faintin' spells is crybaby stuff. Ye've got the makings of a good schizophrenic. Lucky ye've come to the right place."

Indeed, I had. And at only six quid a session. Except that I had no idea what a schizophrenic was. Or what I was getting into that would, depending on how you look at it, rob me of the next half-dozen years or give me the experience of a lifetime.

Laing insisted on calling me a "McCarthy refugee", an exile from the House Un-American anti-communist hunters. This was only half true since I'd also run away from my personal demons in the States, a feverish mental disequilibrium that (I realise now) was the compost of my writing. After a long dry spell as an émigré "London Yankee", I was on a writing jag - novels, journalism, pamphlets, BBC talks. But it didn't stop the anxiety attacks.

In his consulting room Laing and I immediately connected. We shared a childhood of psychic and actual violence from our chaotic family histories. Laing liked using military and boxing metaphors; occasionally we even sparred around his room, jabbing, hooking, feinting. I was certainly more at ease with him than the English poets and novelists I met whose limp handshakes were so unmanly ... so un-American.

At the time of our first meeting Laing was on his way to becoming the Bob Dylan of "existential" psychoanalysis with his bestselling book, The Divided Self, a bible for disturbed teenagers. For all its Sartrean chatter - ontological insecurity, being-for-itself, etc - Laing's message was starkly simple: doctors must stop treating mental patients as objects to be done things to, and have the courage to meet patients as equals in an "I-thou encounter". But all that was only his public self. There was another, secret side, he hinted. (I love secrets!) He dared me to pass through his most private and cherished door: the door of perception known as the schizophrenic revolution.

I'd no idea what he was talking about. But if it was a revolution I was all for it. Laing and I were both "politicals" of the leftish type (CND, New Left, all that). And like most people under 40 we were fed up with a moribund Establishment stifling our best energies. A new music (psychedelic rock, the Stones, acid folk, Grateful Dead) and new clothes styles (mod, razor-cut hair, Italian suits) seemed to signal the birth of an "absolute beginners" Britain, vital and violent and more like us.

Laing's ascendant star was perfectly timed. Antonin Artaud's "madness is truth" was all the rage, as was David Mercer's TV play A Suitable Case For Treatment, later a film. The feminist playwright Jane Arden went around chanting, "We are all mad. If you are a woman then you are mad."

Laing's early writing spoke, poetically, from his troubled gut to growing audiences of the disenchanted and mentally unbalanced, including me. He preached that the root of the thing that sickened us was the emotional dysfunction within families encoded in the parents' "double bind" ("Go away but tell me you love me"), and loveless (or overbearingly loving) contradictory communication that drove kids literally mad. In this sense, love itself was the ticking time-bomb of all personal relationships. One struggled to free oneself from the chains of love in order to find a selfhood that might exist only on the other side of madness. Indeed, Laing's unfinished last book was titled The Lies Of Love.

His theatrical genius was to "give psychiatry a human face" - to translate his philosophical interests (Husserl, Jaspers and Kierkegaard) into common street language that spoke to his own experiences as a "policeman" (his word) of other people's mental illnesses in Scottish and British army hospitals where he had worked as an intern. In a quiet rage he told some pretty gory stories that left me in no doubt of his guilt that as a young doctor he had let himself participate in the medical profession's legalised "mind butchery" of their patients. As our relationship deepened it became clear that, for desperate men like us who lived in an amoral Dostoevskian world almost beyond suicide, anything was permissible if it (a) broke a few teeth in the fight for the liberation of the mentally "ill" and (b) brought us closer to the extinction of Ego (we thought in capital letters).

Laing, whom I trusted with my soul, and I crossed the line of professional etiquette when we began exchanging roles, he the patient and I the therapist, and took LSD together in his office and in my Bayswater apartment. Somehow, along the way, we created - with Laing's closest colleagues Dr Aaron Esterson, David Cooper and Sid Briskin - the Philadelphia Association. This was a registered charity dedicated to devising a humane alternative to the "treatment" of the mentally sick that until recently had included insulin coma, heavy drugs and even lobotomy. (Electroshock therapy of the crudest kind was still quite popular in mental hospitals.)

By putting forward our respectable public face and sidetracking our private agenda - going personally crazy - we found and voluntarily staffed Kingsley Hall in east London, which is now celebrating its 30th anniversary. At the time, Kingsley Hall became an international mecca for psycho-tourists, earnest American helpers, celebrities like Tim Leary and Allen Ginsberg ... and a haven for the truly desperate cases whom other doctors had given up on. Any given night you could run into a Beatle on acid or the former mental nurse Mary Barnes (memorialised in a play by David Edgar) daubing shit on the walls of her room.

Then, of course, there were these cursed meetings of the inner circle. I hadn't participated in anything like our Philadelphia Association roundelays of insult-trading since hanging out on Chicago street corners as a teenager. Except that we were grown-ups. Wherever did these "speak bitterness" sessions come from, Mao's China? They were acrid and soul-punishing and, I guess, meant to toughen us for the Long Ascent to the Everest of mental breakdown, our private goal of spiritual rebirth.

Laing and I had sealed a devil's bargain. Although we set out to "cure" schizophrenia, we became schizophrenic in our attitudes to ourselves and to the outside world. Our personal relationships in the Philadelphia Association became increasingly fraught. At the same time - I speak only for myself - the sheer brutality of our interchanges conveyed an unmistakable message: you are already living on the other side of sanity.

It all ended badly ... and well.

From the start Laing and I had made a solemn compact that we would protect each other's back - like Kirk Douglas and Burt Lancaster in Gunfight At The OK Corral - if either of us broke down. "Breaking down" was, of course, an essential precondition for "breaking through" that would finally cure us of the human condition.

I was the first to go, at Kingsley Hall. Proper do it was, too. In front of witnesses. Lost my mind entirely and not a bad feeling. Leaped and danced on the communal supper table, and with an imaginary prayer shawl around my shoulders skipped around wailing an authentic, or gobbledegook, Hebrew prayer. And then it came, the vision I'd been working and longing for. I had to laugh. God, in the shape of (I swear) a railway union organiser, sat me on His knee for some stern advice. Stop being so crazy, He commanded. It's self-indulgent. Go back to your writing and live normally like other folks.

Laing, at the head of the table, had grown alarmed by my behaviour. His anxiety spread to others. That night, after I left Kingsley Hall, several of the doctors, who persuaded themselves that I was suicidal, piled into two cars, sped to my apartment, broke in, and jammed me with needles full of Largactil, a fast-acting sedative used by conventional doctors in mental wards. Led by Laing, they dragged me back to Kingsley Hall where I really did become suicidal. I was enraged: the beating and drugging was such a violation of our code. Now I knew exactly how mental patients felt when the nurses set about them before the doctor stuck in the needle.

Before I could fight back - at least four big guys including Laing were pinning me down - the drug took effect. The last thing I remember saying was, "You bastards don't know what you're doing ..."

They left me alone in an upstairs cubicle overlooking a balcony with a 30ft drop. I had to figure a way to escape from this bunch of do-gooders who had lost their nerve as well as their minds. Fortunately, I had learned some tricks of the madness trade as a "barefoot doctor" in Villa 21, David Cooper's innovative schizophrenic ward at Shenley hospital. Rule Number One, which I had ignored till now: don't make your doctors more anxious than they already are.

Choosing life over death, I put on an act pretending that I had rejoined Laing's obedient flock - which relaxed the doctors' hysteria - and when they were all safely asleep slipped away from the hall back to my flat. For months afterwards I slept with a baseball bat in my bed.

In 1975, 10 years after I broke with Laing, I completed a comic novel, Zone Of The Interior, based on my experiences with schizophrenia. Published to widespread notice in the US, it was stopped cold in Britain by Laing's vague threat of a libel action. Potential publishers backed off. A small independent house offered to publish Zone but reluctantly pulled out when two of its board members, both leftwing, strongly opposed. By then Laing had become something of a sacred cow on the left, a darling and victim of the celebrity culture.

My feelings about Laing have changed over time, especially since his sudden death on a tennis court in southern France in 1989. The problem is there were several RD Laings: doctor, prophet, father and husband, builder and destroyer, personal friend and ultimately my bullyboy. Looking back, I now see that his own "need to be needed" - a capital crime in his rule book - caused him to panic when he believed, for example, that a patient, patron or friend was about to leave him. And, as he taught us, there's nothing scarier than a medical professional who has control over others but not over his own anxiety.

With all its bullshit and doublethink, "Laingianism" tried hard to make a difference. To our credit, we didn't really see much difference between them (patients) and us (healers). We had a go, and some of us paid a price.

Recently I contacted some mental health activists - former patients, family members of patients, psychotherapists, etc. Their verdict is mixed. "The problem with Laing's legacy," one long-time campaigner told me, "is that he produced a competitive and hostile climate where the patient became collateral damage between warring factions". Yet others claim Laing's influence produced modest but real improvement.

A retired psychiatrist testifies, "I was a trainee at the Maudsley in the 1960s and I think [Laing] influenced many [other trainees] to feel closer to patients and to interact more normally with them, rather than in the stilted or 'clinical' way that both psychiatry and psychoanalysis promoted at the time." A more pessimistic therapist speaks only of "cosmetic changes" because the "'biological' view of 'mental illness' rules more supreme than ever". But even he cites "pockets of resistance" that today include Laing- and Esterson-influenced doctors, probation officers, psychologists, who are out there working, quietly, in the field.

"La lutte continue," as the revolutionists say. Yes, ECT is back in vogue. The mind butchers never give up and keep coming back with fancier rationales for doing what they admit they don't understand. The task is as yet undone.

· Zone Of The Interior, by Clancy Sigal, is finally being published in the UK, by Pomona at £9.99


guardian.co.uk© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Non-fiction: Jan 6

$
0
0

PD Smith, Jo Littler and Vera Rule on The Last Generation | Water Under Threat | Tête-a-Tête | RD Laing: A Life | The House by the Thames and the People Who Lived There

The Last Generation: How Nature Will Take Her Revenge for Climate Change, by Fred Pearce (Eden Project Books, £8.99)

Forget the idea that nature is fragile: "She is strong and packs a serious counterpunch." According to Fred Pearce, nature is about to take revenge for man-made global warming. Civilisation has blossomed in an era of climatic stability, but ours will be the last generation to experience this. The greenhouse gases produced by our carbon-dependent lifestyles have awoken "climatic monsters", and no one knows quite what they will do. We may face mega-droughts and super-hurricanes. The Gulf Stream could switch off, plunging London into Siberian winters. Recent research suggests that when the last ice age ended, 12,000 years ago, temperatures rose dramatically - in under a year. Pearce argues that the climate does not change gradually, but "by sudden drunken lurches". Within a decade we will hit the safe threshold for carbon dioxide; after this we reach terra incognita as far as the climate is concerned. Pearce is a self-proclaimed "sceptical environmentalist" who has been writing about climate change for 18 years, but admits that the current state of the planet "scares" him. It's scary stuff indeed, but well-written and important.
PDS

Water Under Threat, by Larbi Bouguerra, translated by Patrick Camiller (Zed Books, £12.99)

Larbi Bouguerra was born in Tunisia in a house without running water. In his community, water was "a vital substance to be shared ... not [treated as] private property". Although he is a scientist who has researched the problem of pesticides in water, Bouguerra points out that "science does not know everything about this little tri-atomic molecule". He begins by exploring water's symbolism in world culture, from creation myths to modern literature. Among many memorable quotations is this, from the 14th-century Sufi poet Mahmud Shabestri: "If you split the heart of a single drop of water, / One hundred pure oceans flow forth." Much of the book is devoted to current political and economic issues. The way our consumer society treats water clearly angers Bouguerra: making one car consumes 400,000 litres of water; in Brazil, 22 glasses of water are needed to produce one glass of orange juice. Alongside such profligacy, 6,000 children die each day for lack of clean water. The book speaks powerfully of the need to address such inequalities and to relearn what our ancestors knew: that "the water cycle ties us all to one another as well as to Mother Nature".
PDS

Tête-a-Tête: The Lives and Loves of Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir, by Hazel Rowley (Vintage, £8.99)

The existentialism of Simone de Beauvoir and Jean-Paul Sartre understood there to be no pre-existing essence to life: life is what people make of it. So make a lot of it they did, in all kinds of ways, from philosophical inquiry and political campaigning to sexual and emotional experimentation. Sartre and De Beauvoir saw themselves as "two of a kind", with their relationship as primary and all others as secondary, although this was an unstable and inconstant principle. (And for someone whose most famous maxim was "hell is other people", Sartre certainly slept with a lot of them.) Rowley vividly relates the intricacies of their lives, including the less-than-handsome Sartre's penchant for needy young women, De Beauvoir's bisexuality, and her abiding passion for the American novelist Nelson Algren. While it might initially appear to be the tale of two existentialist philosophers packaged into a Mills & Boon narrative, Tête-a-Tête is much more than that, winding the story of Sartre and De Beauvoir's partnership through an intelligent account of their intellectual projects and everyday lives. Completely compelling.
JL

RD Laing: A Life, by Adrian Laing (Sutton Publishing, £8.99)

"If I could turn you on, if I could drive you out of your wretched mind, if I could tell you I would let you know." Erratically brilliant and startlingly inventive, RD Laing threw the core tenets of psychiatry up in the air in his attempts to find new ways to communicate. Influenced by Marx, Buddhism and the existential phenomenology of Sartre, Ronnie Laing came to believe that madness was both an expression of social contradiction and a natural healing process that should be allowed to run its course. Crucial to this process is a change in interpersonal perception: for "what matters most in the patient's environment is the people in it". Laingian treatments involved communal living, experimenting with LSD and rethinking the psychiatrist/patient dynamic. (Confronted with a naked, rocking patient, Laing would strip off and rock alongside them.) Here, his son Adrian outlines his many experiments (sometimes dangerously ramshackle, sometimes profoundly inspired) and paints a vivid picture of how the raucous Glaswegian pisshead in Ronnie constantly battled it out with the acid-infused mystic: Laing as both godlike guru and Daddy Dearest.
JL

The House by the Thames and the People Who Lived There, by Gillian Tindall (Pimlico, £8.99)

Gillian Tindall's microhistory of 49 Bankside, Southwark, London, spooked me; like reading the obituary of someone you loved when young, but never saw thereafter. There it all was again, the disused range in the front kitchen, which overlooked and indeed oversmelt the Thames, and the central dogleg staircase, just as I remember it when the Black family were in boho residence in the last days of old marine and mercantile Southwark - Claire Black found me a home round the corner. Of course Tindall gently erases many of the myths that made No 49 and the surrounding wildernesses of cindered carpark so appealing to me, a Bankside groupie pre-Sam Wanamaker's restoration of the Globe. But that's hardly a loss, since her fresh details add more to the story - the 16th- century pike and perch fishfarm ponds; the faint miasma tainting the air from the early 19th-century holders of the Phoenix Gas Company; and the postwar Peregrine Worsthorne tenancy of the house, when infection-bearing rats swaggered up, piratical, from the cellars.
VR


guardian.co.uk© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Non-fiction: Jan 7

$
0
0

Jonathan Beckman on RD Laing: A Life | Aesthetics and Politics | Under the Weather | Tete a Tete

RD Laing: A Life by Adrian Laing. Sutton £8.99

Ronnie Laing, author of countercultural textbooks such as The Divided Self and Knots and dabbler in Eastern mysticism, was a man whose keen intelligence only provoked shriller accusations of charlatanism. He shook up the genteel world of London psychoanalysis by providing therapy with a philosophical purpose, through his reading of phenomenological and existential works. RD Laing fathered the author of this book in his first marriage, though after the divorce, Adrian had barely any contact with his father. Adrian's biography is workmanlike, but he throws away his trump card by refusing to discuss his relationship with his father, an investigation that would have been all the more interesting in the context of RD Laing's long-standing interest in the psychodynamics of families.

Aesthetics and Politics by Theodor Adorno, Walter Benjamin, Ernst Bloch, Bertolt Brecht, Georg Lukacs. Verso £6.99

There is nothing Marxists enjoy more than a good squabble. This collection brings together some of the most impassioned debates among mostly German Marxists from the first half of the 20th century. For those of us who believe good art doesn't need to be made with one eye towards the advancement of socialism, these discussions will appear to have got lost on the way to the ball game. I was torn between laughter and despair when the introduction to one of the sections declared, without a smidgen of irony, that Georg Lukacs's lack of interest in the individual work of art was 'the notorious blind spot' in his criticism. None the less, there is an excellent essay by Theodor Adorno on Bertolt Brecht, and extracts from the correspondence between Adorno and Walter Benjamin illuminate their close but fraught relationship.

Under the Weather byTom Fort. Arrow £7.99

The weather holds a curious fascination for the British public that never diminishes, despite the banality of the topic. Tom Fort, whose previous works include a social history of lawns and a book about eels, has written a genial guide to our long-standing interest in the weather. He travels round the country in search of places of meteorological interest, a thankless task given the capricious nature of the British climate. We hear of characters such as William Merle, a 14th-century rector, whose devotion to recording the variations in local wind speed almost certainly exceeded his devotion to his Lord. Despite some incontinent harrumphings against the political reaction to climate change, this is a light and charming read that will add anecdotal spice to any idle chitchat about the prospects of rain.

Tete a Tete by Hazel Rowley. Vintage £8.99

Hazel Rowley prefaces Tete a Tete by claiming to have written not a biography of Sartre and de Beauvoir but a portrait of the philosophers and life partners 'close up, in their most intimate moments'. Sartre, de Beauvoir and the lovers whom they often shared are certainly captured with unsparing scrutiny. Sartre emerges as callous and manipulative of de Beauvoir and girlfriends alike. Nevertheless, Rowley's touching descriptions of the philosophers' early encounters and of their continuing devotion to each other suggest a strong bond, if not of love, then of deep friendship and mutual dependence. Later, Rowley stops giving this bond enough attention and in the course of Tete a Tete Sartre and de Beauvoir share fewer intimate moments, so the focus jerks from one to the other as they make guest appearances in each other's lives.


guardian.co.uk© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Elizabeth Day and Graham Keeley on RD Laing and the tragic death of his son

$
0
0

He was a pioneering psychiatrist who blamed parents for the psychological problems of their offspring. But as a father, RD Laing was depressed, alcoholic and often cruel. What would he have made of the latest tragedy to hit his own family - the death 12 days ago of his son, Adam?

Before speaking, Adrian Laing takes a small, precise sip of his cappuccino and carefully wipes away the specks of froth from his top lip. 'When people ask me what it was like to be RD Laing's son,' he says, 'I tell them it was a crock of shit.' He laughs, shaking his head.

The question of what it was like to be the child of one of the 20th century's most influential psychotherapists has been playing on Adrian's mind of late. 'It was ironic that my father became well-known as a family psychiatrist,' he says, 'when, in the meantime, he had nothing to do with his own family.'

As Adrian speaks in a modest north London cafe near his Highgate home, the same paradox is being pondered by a handful of mourners gathering a thousand miles south on the Balearic island of Formentera. It was here, on this windswept rocky outcrop, that the decomposed body of Adrian's half-brother, Adam, was found by police 12 days ago. Adam, RD Laing's oldest son from his second marriage, was discovered in a tent pitched on private land, the floor scattered with the detritus of a drunken night. Next to him lay a discarded vodka bottle and an almost-empty bottle of wine.

Initial police reports suggested that Adam, 41, had taken drugs and might have been on a suicidal binge following the end of his relationship with a long-term girlfriend, Janina, earlier this year. The post-mortem found that Adam, a tall, well-built and seemingly healthy man, died of a heart attack.

Conjecture about his death continued, rumours swirling around the beachside bars and restaurants of the island. There was talk of Adam's partying lifestyle, his free-spirited take on life and his occasional bouts of depression and heavy drinking. Over the last few years he had made a haphazard living skippering yachts for day-trippers or as an odd-job man in the quiet winter months. He was a regular at the Bar es Cap, where owner Mariano Mayans remembers him as 'a good man who liked his drink but could handle it.' A sailor at heart, Adam had crossed the Atlantic 11 times and was, by all accounts, a restless soul.

'He was a bit wild but a good guy,' says Nicholas Scherr, who moors a yacht on the island. 'He needed the challenge of the ocean.' Adrian adds: 'Adam found his own way in life. He was a lovely guy and it was a shock to hear of his death. I think it will take some time to sink in.'

Friends say he had grown melancholic since his separation from Janina, a German diving instructor, at the end of last year. He moved out of the house they shared in Cap de Barberia, a tranquil corner away from the tourist beaches. At first he looked after Scherr's yacht in the port of La Savina, sleeping on the boat. Then, a month ago, in an increasingly fragile state of mind, he erected a tent in a wooded area near Janina's home, on private land owned by a British couple he knew. It was here that his body was found, in an isolated field far away from home, accessible only by criss-crossing dusty tracks. It was a lonely way to end a life.

'I think he was depressed before he died,' says shipwright Jorge Agusti. 'He had split up with his girlfriend of four or five years and he had no work organised. He was not short of money but he was saying he was ready to leave. Adam was at the point of packing his bags.

'He liked to drink but he could take it. I saw him a few days before his body was found, and we went on drinking into the night. He seemed all right at the end.'

But Adam was not all right and, despite his outgoing demeanour, had not been for some time. 'I think Adam caught the depressive mood from his father,' says the psychotherapist Theodor Itten, a former student of RD Laing who later became a close family friend. Dr Itten says the break-up of his parents' marriage - Adam's mother, Jutta, separated from Laing in 1981 - affected him badly. 'When he was 13, 14, 15, he was rebellious, he dropped out of school. I think that was a very sad period of time for Adam. He tried to soothe it with smoking, sometimes with drugs and with drinking as a sort of self-medication.

'His death came as a shock. I sometimes wondered if he would get lost on one of his travels on the ocean or break his neck skiing down a wild mountainside. He was a very adventurous young man. Whatever the circumstances [of his death], perhaps he didn't have enough energy or power in him to deal with life.'

Many of Adam's friends on the island he made his home had no idea who his father was. 'He never talked about him,' says Hector Puig, 47, a handyman. If they had known, they might have been struck by the horrible irony that one of Ronald David Laing's lasting contributions to psychiatry in the 1960s and 70s was linking mental distress to a dysfunctional family upbringing. 'From the moment of birth [...],' Laing wrote in 1967, 'the baby is subjected to these forces of violence, called love, as its mother and father have been, and their parents and their parents before them. These forces are mainly concerned with destroying most of its potentialities. This enterprise is on the whole successful.'

Laing theorised that insanity could be understood as a reaction to the divided self. Instead of arising as a purely medical disease, schizophrenia was thus the result of wrestling with two identities: the identity defined for us by our families and our authentic identity, as we experience ourselves to be. When the two are fundamentally different, it triggers an internal fracturing of the self.

His theories overturned the prevailing orthodoxy of the day that mental illness was, as the German psychiatrist Karl Jaspers had put it, 'un-understandable'. He became a countercultural guru in the Sixties and Seventies, attracting a large anti-establishment following who admired his anarchic and individualist philosophies. Laing believed that mental illness was a sane response to an insane world and that a psychiatrist had a duty to communicate empathetically with patients. Once, when faced with a naked schizophrenic woman rocking silently to and fro in a padded cell, Laing took off his own clothes and sat next to her, rocking to the same rhythm until she spoke for the first time in months.

As a psychiatrist, both brilliant and unconventional, RD Laing pioneered the humane treatment of the mentally ill. But as a father, clinically depressed and alcoholic, he bequeathed his 10 children and his two wives a more chequered legacy.

This was partly a blighted genetic inheritance - Laing died, as did Adam, of a heart attack while playing tennis at the age of 61. He, too, struggled with drink and drugs, experimenting with LSD in his later years after being influenced by the work of the psychedelic drug pioneer Timothy Leary. But mostly, it was the result of an absorption in his work so total that he could be guilty of breath-taking callousness and seeming hypocrisy towards his own children. Adrian, 50, Laing's second eldest son, sees it like this: 'Anyone who has become deliberately well-known, inevitably they've done that at the expense of their family. They've gone their own way. They can't do both.'

According to his friends, colleagues and relatives, Laing was frequently unable to extend the compassion he felt for his patients to his own family. His children were left to grapple with their demons. Sometimes, as with Adam, it came with tragic consequences. For all his professional benevolence, Laing was a flawed parent. He, too, was capable of unleashing 'these forces of violence called love'.

Ronald Laing was five when his parents told him Santa Claus did not exist. He never forgave them, claiming in later years that the realisation they had been lying to him triggered his first existential crisis. For the rest of his life, his childhood memories were bleak. He told interviewers of an emotionally deprived upbringing in the Govanhill area of Glasgow, with a disciplinarian mother who broke his favourite toys when he became too attached to them.

His background left Laing with an abiding antipathy towards the nuclear family. By the time of his death he had fathered six sons and four daughters with four women over a period of 36 years. 'I think his reputation took some blows in terms of the way he died, leaving behind 10 children and looking like an irresponsible father,' says Adrian, the youngest of five children Laing had with his first wife, Anne. 'There was an enormous backlash then from families who thought he was blaming them for their children's mental illness.'

His own family was the first casualty of Laing's increasing celebrity. The reissuing in 1965 of his most famous work, The Divided Self, led to frequent television and radio appearances. In many ways his existentialist approach - he believed that social 'sanity' was fabricated by mutual consent; that the mentally ill were as fully human as the medics who were classifying them - captured the countercultural zeitgeist of the 1960s. His radical rejection of convention ensured he became the most famous cult psychiatrist in the country. Charismatic, darkly handsome and possessed of an innate sharpness of mind, he soon embarked on several extra-marital affairs, spending weeks and months away from the family home in northwest London. Anne was left behind, treading water in the wake of his success. The marriage finally came to a juddering halt in 1967, by which time, says Adrian, 'my mother had totally lost it. She found it so humiliating because he was becoming so well-known but he wasn't living with us.'

Laing had already started an affair with Jutta Werner, a German graphic designer who would become his second wife. Despite his burgeoning career, he paid only the legal minimum in child maintenance to his first family. 'He adopted an "out of sight, out of mind" mentality,' says Adrian, who started taking odd jobs aged 13 to contribute to the family income. 'In my mind, he confused liberalism with neglect. My mother was furious about it. She had an unfathomable amount of resentment. Her expression for him was "the square root of nothing".'

Laing would disappear for months on end, forgetting birthdays before turning up in a blizzard of misdirected anger. In a 1994 biography he wrote of his father, Adrian recounts one of Laing's rare visits to their new home in Glasgow when, having argued with Jutta, he took out his anger by beating his daughter, Karen.

He was an unpredictable, occasionally frenzied, father figure who acted with little regard for the consequences. When, in 1975, his second eldest child, Susan, was diagnosed with terminal monoblastic leukaemia, a row broke out between her parents. Anne felt it would be kinder not to tell Susan the diagnosis. Laing disagreed. In the face of fierce opposition from Anne, Susan's fiancé and her doctors, he insisted on travelling to the hospital to inform her that, in all likelihood, she would not live beyond her 21st birthday.

'That was the worst thing,' says Adrian. 'My mother just went potty. She said he was going to rot in hell for that. Then, after he told Susie, he went back to London and left us to deal with it. My mother was spitting blood.'

Susie died, aged 21, in March 1976. 'My father was riddled with guilt about it. He would have been aware of the statistics that demonstrate there is a higher chance of dying from that particular disease if you are from a broken family.'

A year later, Laing's eldest child, Fiona, had a nervous breakdown and was taken to Gartnavel Mental Hospital, Glasgow. Anxious that she should not be subjected to the brutal electric shock treatment and impersonal medical examinations that Laing so detested, Adrian called on his father for advice.

'I was really upset. I asked, "What the fuck are you going to do about it?"' Adrian pauses. A curious smile curls at the corner of his lips. 'At the time we were living in a house called Ruskin Place, and his response was: "Gartnavel or Ruskin Place, what's the fucking difference?" It was a double-bind, you see. Either he had nothing to do with it [Fiona's breakdown] and his theories were shit, or he had everything to do with it and he was shit.'

But how on earth could RD Laing, the celebrated psychiatrist whose entire reputation rested on his theories espousing the compassionate treatment of the mentally ill, reconcile his professional position with his personal behaviour? How could he empathise so profoundly with a naked, rocking schizophrenic patient he had never met and yet fail so spectacularly to do the same with his own daughter?

Adrian leans forward, resting his elbows on the stainless steel cafe table. 'In terms of how he rationalised it... erm... I'm not sure that... I don't think my father felt he was the cause [of the breakdown] so he wouldn't feel it was hypocritical.'

Later he tells a revealing story about Susan being interviewed in 1974 by a journalist writing a feature on the children of famous people. The piece ended with a memorable quote from her: 'He can solve everybody else's problems but not our own.'

The Hungarian psychiatrist Thomas Szasz puts it a different way. Laing, he wrote in 2004, displayed 'an avoidance of responsibility for his first family, indefensible since his line had been that the breakdown of children could be attributed to parents and families.'

But Laing seemed to mellow with the passing of the years. To his second family with Jutta - Natasha, now 38, Max, 32, and Adam - and to his two youngest children with different women - Benjamin, 23, and Charles, 20 - he proved a more kindly father. Adrian was gradually reconciled with him over the years, coming to stay with his half-siblings when he studied for his bar exams in London. 'Ronnie was clear, kind, warm-hearted and sagacious,' says Theodor Itten, who knew him in this later period. 'He was very gentle with his family. Once he told me that in his first family he had hit his children because he didn't know any better. I was surprised because I always thought Ronnie had been the Ronnie I knew, very playful and comforting as a father.'

Many of Laing's friends and colleagues speak of his extraordinary intuition and say he could read people with disarming precision. When sober, it was a talent that could reap rewards by winning someone's trust, whether a girlfriend or a patient. 'He had the gift of being open, of being honest,' says Sue Sünkel, 57, the German-born psychotherapist who gave birth to Laing's ninth child, Benjamin, in 1984. 'I'd never met anybody like him. He didn't feel the need to fix you. He wasn't afraid of people's pain; he was open to it and open to his own.'

But in his later years, as he became more dependent on alcohol and drugs, his judgment was blunted. When he was drunk Laing could exploit the fault-lines in someone's personality with a vicious cruelty. One of his students, Francis Huxley, once said that Laing's words could act like 'a psychic fist hitting the navel of insincerity'.

'My father was deeply intuitive and could make you feel you were talking rubbish just by looking at you,' says Adrian. 'It was very unnerving. He could pick up every nuance of your gestures and body language. When he was drunk he would rant and rave and it felt quite dangerous. He could be emotionally vicious. If he thought I was talking rubbish, his favourite expressions would be "psychotic" or "offensive", and I would say "Why don't you just say you disagree with me, Dad?" It was just so tiring. He was such a heavy drinker and I watched his second marriage disintegrate. Jutta would plead with him and say, "Where are you going to be in five years?"'

In 1987 Laing was forced to withdraw his name from the General Medical Council's medical register after a patient accused him of drunkenness and physical assault (the complaint was later withdrawn). He began to hold 'rebirthing' sessions and took spiritual pilgrimages to Sri Lanka and India. Much of his later work was erratic, crude in tone and increasingly discredited by mainstream psychiatry. 'The general view of Laing's theories within psychiatry is that they are the product of a wild, utopian, romantic imagination - or interesting as museum artefacts but of no contemporary relevance,' says Daniel Burston, author of The Wing of Madness: The Life and Work of RD Laing. 'The view outside psychiatry is more complex.'

What about the view of Laing's own family? Does Adrian believe the drunken disintegration of his father had a lasting effect on Laing's children? 'I think the entire family is a paradigm of cause and effect,' he says bluntly. 'With Adam... there's a sense in which... some people, if their father's an alcoholic, will turn into alcoholics themselves. After my father and Jutta sold the family home, that was when he really found himself on his own, at a relatively young age. He wore his heart on his sleeve. He never had children, he had girlfriends and there was never that much time between them. I would have liked to have seen him happy, settled with kids, but he just didn't like being tied down. He liked to feel free.' He trails off. 'It's a pity we didn't get the last episode of that story.'

Adrian says he has now made his peace with the infamous RD Laing, especially since becoming a parent himself (he has five children). In his biography of his father, Adrian drily notes that his relationship with him 'has improved greatly since his death'. 'I'm very relaxed about him now,' he says. 'I had enough occasions before he died to let him have it. We were friends.'

For all his inconsistencies, there is little doubt that Laing loved his children, in spite of the flawed manner in which he expressed it. In one of his later works, The Facts of Life, Laing wrote: 'Whether life is worth living depends for me on whether there is love in life.'

As Jutta and her two surviving children paid their last respects to Adam at a private cremation on Friday, perhaps they remembered the essence of these words. Perhaps they recalled the Janus-like brilliance of their late husband and father, his gentleness and his wildness; his charismatic charm and his unpredictability; the sharpness of his thoughts, and the drunkenness that blurred them.

Today they will scatter Adam's ashes over the ocean he knew so well. Despite his chaotic life, Adam Laing did have his family's love. Perhaps his father might have judged it a life 'worth living'.

Shrink wrapped: The life of RD Laing

Personal Life

· Born Ronald David Laing, 7 October 1927 in Glasgow.

· Studied medicine at Glasgow University.

· Fathered 10 children by four women.

· Died of a heart attack on 23 August 1989 while playing tennis in St Tropez, France.

Theories

·Laing helped popularise psychology detailing various forms of madness in The Divided Self (1960)

· Attributing schizophrenia to bad parenting is Laing's most criticised idea, put forward in Sanity, Madness and the Family (1964).

· In The Politics of Experience (1967) Laing argued that it is not people who are mad, but the world.

Controversies

· Took LSD with patients and drank heavily.

· Forced to withdraw from the medical register of the General Medical Council in 1987 after an accusation of drunkenness and assault.
Katie Toms


guardian.co.uk© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Students wave placards and I'm haunted by the ghosts of demos past

$
0
0

Fielding remembers when teachers – inspired by Allen Ginsberg, RD Laing and Jimi Hendrix – were going to change the world and save the working class

I walk down the streets of Bloomsbury. I'm returning to some ancient haunts. I learned to be a teacher around these parts. Ho hum.

I did my PGCE round here at the Institute of Education in 1967 – the Summer of Love.

I get to Senate House. Haggard students queue for gruel and wave placards about their next futile demo. I smile at them. That was me so long ago.

I pass lecture halls and hear the ghosts of Basil Bernstein talking of Restricted and Elaborate codes and Harold Rosen having major insights about language and class. Pedagogical giants.

The Institute was the most intellectually charged place I've ever known. We were knee deep in Foucault and Lacan and RD Laing, and once Allen Ginsberg took his clothes off and went "om!" and cursed Moloch.

Vertiginous stuff. Sexy, incomprehensible, countercultural – and probably in the vicinity of complete bollocks.

I cross to Russell Square. Falling, burnished light dances on skeletal trees.

Ah, the same trees where I decided to be a teacher. Just there. The very spot! I'd just smoked some dope and seen Jimi Hendrix live and gazed like a clot on blossoms that frolicked in the spring moonlight.

Nothing could ever be the same again. Bliss it was to be alive, to be a teacher was very heaven. We were the storm troopers of Albion, we were going to change the world and save the working class.

I charged in on my first teaching practice and set fire to newspaper to the tune of The Crazy World of Arthur Brown.

"Create! Create! Poems about fire gods!" I yelled.

"Fuck off, hippy!" replied the NF boys of the Abbey Wood estate as I snuffed out the flames with my M&S desert boots. Happy times.

I honed this pedagogy over the years – threw in a bit of class management. For a few years, things were great. Then, wallop. 1979. Thatcher. We were The Enemy Within. We plodded on. It was still fun.

Then, wallop. 1988. The National Curriculum. Things shrank and got all corporate. Many of my teaching chums went doollaly and took to the booze, or beta-blockers, and were culled by barbarous managements. Decent and honourable, they are exiles in their own country.

Modern teachers must be so professional, so organised, so quiescent to deliver so brilliantly a syllabus in which they surely can't believe. I'd like to think they've had enough – like these students in this lovely, burnished park.

They haven't a hope against the media, Murdoch and Ginsberg's Moloch. But so what? I'm on their side.

I could well pop along to the demonstration. Dotards and students unite!

Michele Hanson's friend Fielding is a hip dotard who taught English for 35 years in inner-city comprehensives


guardian.co.uk© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Unthinkable? Rehabilitating RD Laing | Editorial

$
0
0

He's been unfashionable for decades, but in an era of big-pharma and proliferating diagnoses, is it time to reassess?

The trouble with great men or women who lead the kind of lives described as "colourful" is that they provide critics with a ready-made excuse to dismiss their work. At the same time, it's doubtful that someone like Ronald Laing, whose name is still disdained 22 years after his death, would have broken as much ground were he not arrogant, angry and unconventional. A psychiatrist born into the age of doctor-knows-best, Laing's questioning of every assumption about mental illness earned him derision, as well as a devoted following. His first book, The Divided Self, which presented schizophrenia as a rational response to intolerable experiences, was written at just 28. Sanity, Madness and the Family set out his most controversial idea: that family life plays an important part in the development of schizophrenia. This put him at loggerheads with an establishment that saw mental illness as a medical problem, not one that could to be explained by society or patients' relationships. Laing may have alienated carers and relatives of schizophrenics, and been unrealistic about treatments. But he provoked scrutiny of psychiatric methods, and opened a rich seam of thinking about our civilisation's discontents to boot. He's been unfashionable for decades, but in an era of big-pharma and proliferating diagnoses, is time for a reassessment? A theatre adaptation of his work, Knots, this summer suggests new minds are interested. They'd do best to forget the baggage and let his remarkable writing speak for itself.


guardian.co.uk© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Laing's legacy

$
0
0

I was thrilled to see your editorial on RD Laing (Unthinkable?, 27 August), because my PhD (Descandalizing Laing: RD Laing as a Social Theorist) was concerned with this very subject. The thesis is concerned with debunking the myths around Laing's work, and with responding to the poor scholarship contained within much of the criticism of him. Laing's work does indeed deserve more respect than it has been given. No other theorist dares to question the fundamental assumptions that psychiatry is based upon, while making such coherent arguments for the development of a "science of persons".

Dr Samantha Bark

Nottingham

You report on the "worrying" gap between the GCSE results obtained by boys and girls (Report, 26 August). Surely the more worrying trend is that, despite being better qualified,41 years after the Equal Pay Act women are still paid less than their male counterparts for equivalent work?

Simon Samuroff

Harrow, Middlesex

• Geof Davey (Letters, 26 August) writes of the prospect of solar power being brought from Libya's desert to Europe. No, no! The link should be in the other direction – Africa needs that power much more than Europe.

Paul Tench

Cardiff

• Geoff Holman (Letters, 27 August) wonderfully misses the point in his discussion of ivy and bankers. Ivy only attacks diseased trees.

Dr Simon Harris

Rossett, Wrexham

• I'm sorry, Mary Scanlan (Letters, 27 August), but an aerodrome is not "any location from which aeroplanes take off and land". That is an airstrip. An aerodrome must have some buildings, personnel and navigational equipment, and is smaller than an airport.

Ian MacDonald

Billericay, Essex

• Barbara Govan and her nine friends are not completely obsolete (Letters, 27 August). In Wookey Hole, Somerset, there is a warning sign that reads: "This road is not suitable for charabancs."

John Gill

Wirral


guardian.co.uk© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Response: RD Laing's ideas on psychiatry are neither irrelevant nor unfashionable

$
0
0

His emphasis on patient care and choice has much to teach us about mental illness

Your leader column states that psychiatrist RD Laing has been "unfashionable for decades" and asks if it is time to "reassess" his ideas (Unthinkable? Rehabilitating RD Laing, 26 August). And you continue: "It's doubtful that someone like Ronald Laing, whose name is still disdained 22 years after his death, would have broken as much ground were he not arrogant, angry and unconventional … Laing's questioning of every assumption about mental illness earned him derision, as well as a devoted following."

As a member of the Philadelphia Association in London, which Laing co-founded in 1965, I can assure you that his ideas are not unfashionable and have been studied for decades. Yes, he advocated that one should think critically about mental distress, calling into question the dogma of his time (eg the biological basis of mental distress, and its treatment). Yes, his methods were often regarded as "unconventional", and he could be "angry". However, many believe he was "angry" for good reason, and his ideas are far from outdated.

Laing's books, such as Sanity, Madness and the Family, did "put him at loggerheads with an establishment that saw mental illness as a medical problem, not one that could be explained by society or patients' relationships". But this was to be expected; Laing was rattling the cage of an establishment with vested interests who did not like to be questioned or held to account.

Although Laing did help change attitudes to mental health and promote the value of psychotherapy to some degree, much of the change that has occurred is mere lip service: outdated and questionable psycho-scientific methods are still the tools of the trade for many psychiatrists, psychologists and psychotherapists.

Laing's methods may not be to everyone's taste, but neither are today's fashionable antidepressant drugs, cognitive behavioural therapy and psychiatric care, nor recent ill-thought-out proposals for the regulation of psychotherapists by the Health Professions Council. The NHS professes to prioritise patient care and patient choice, but limits those suffering from mental distress to a diet of time-limited treatment options.

Indeed many psychotherapists and psychologists entering the NHS are told to be academic and scientific, but not to question the evidence-based approach – a Laingian double bind if ever I saw one. Further, since the introduction of the government's Improving Access to Psychological Therapies programme, many GP counselling services have been replaced, with little evidence to back such a policy other than "saving money".

So choice is limited, thoughtfulness is banished, and other options disregarded. Such developments would have angered Laing today – he was never so "arrogant" as to prevent somebody choosing his or her own method of dealing with mental distress. You assert that "Laing may have alienated carers and relatives of schizophrenics"; perhaps some, but others were helped greatly. And it is unfair to claim he was "unrealistic about treatments" when unrealism is alive and well in the NHS.


guardian.co.uk© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Kingsley Hall: RD Laing's experiment in anti-psychiatry

$
0
0

In 1965, the psychiatrist opened a residential treatment centre that aimed to revolutionise the treatment of mental illness. Five decades on, those who lived and spent time there look back on an era of drama and discovery

• Portraits by Dominic Harris

The maverick psychiatrist RD Laing once described insanity as "a perfectly rational response to an insane world". In 1965, having served as a doctor in the British army and then trained in psychotherapy at the Tavistock Clinic in London, Laing formed the Philadelphia Association with a group of like-minded colleagues. Their aim was to bring about a revolution in the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness.

"We aim to change the way the 'facts' of 'mental health' and 'mental illness' are seen," a later report-come-manifesto explained. "This is more than a new hypothesis inserted into an existing field of research and therapy; it is a proposal to change the model."

From 1965 until 1970, as radical ideas and hippie ideals blossomed then died in cities across the globe, a former community centre in Powis Road in the East End of London became the unlikely setting for Laing's most radical experiment in what came to be known as anti-psychiatry. "We have got Kingsley Hall and I have moved into it," Laing wrote to his colleague, Joe Berke, when he was granted an initial two-year lease. "Others will be moving in in the next two or three weeks... I take it you will pass the word around to relevant people. THIS IS IT."

The "relevant people" in question were other psychiatrists who shared Laing's radical vision and their patients, though even the terms "psychiatrist" and "patient" would be upturned in the next few years at Kingsley Hall. At Laing's insistence, the sprawling house became an asylum in the original Greek sense of the word: a refuge, a safe haven for the psychotic and the schizophrenic, where there were no locks on the doors and no anti-psychotic drugs were administered. People were free to come and go as they pleased and there was a room, painted in eastern symbols, set aside for meditation. There were all-night therapy and role-reversal sessions, marathon Friday night dinners hosted by Laing and visits from mystics, academics and celebrities, including, famously, Sean Connery, a friend and admirer of Laing's. Play was encouraged as was regression through therapy to childhood. (Laing believed that all so-called madness began in the confines of the traditional family structure.)

The first, and subsequently most famous, resident inmate, Mary Barnes, regressed to infancy for a time, smearing the walls with her faeces, squealing for attention and being fed with a bottle. She later became an renowned artist, poet and, in 1979, the subject of a play by David Edgar. More controversially, several patients and workers were given high-grade LSD, which was still legal when Kingsley Hall opened, supposedly to release their inner demons or buried childhood traumas. At least two people jumped off the roof of the building. Its reputation, too, attracted drifters and dropouts and, at least once, the house was raided by the drug squad.

"It was a place that was very much of its time", says the photographer Dominic Harris, who has tracked down several former colleagues of Laing's and their patients, all of whom shared the turbulent, exciting and sometimes tragic experiment in communal therapy. "And it attracted maverick doctors, hippies, people running away from the draft, people trying to find themselves, as well as the seriously mentally ill. It was a time when everything was being challenged and people were allowed to be free in all kinds of ways. Kingsley Hall is seen as a very dangerous idea now by the medical establishment, but, back then, it was part of a greater social upheaval where definitions of authority, family, sexuality and illness were all being questioned."

Harris first became aware of Kingsley Hall, which is just around the corner from his studio in Bow, when he read Jon Ronson's book, The Psychopath Test: A Journey Through the Madness Industry, in which Laing, who died in 1989, makes a fleeting appearance. Intrigued, Harris contacted Joe Berke, who put him in touch with a patient. Step by step, he tracked down other Kingsley Hall residents, visited them, photographed them and interviewed them. The result is a self-published photography book, The Residents, which includes Harris's intimate portraits, pictures of the surviving but now disused house, as well as personal testimonies of those who were there.

"A lot of people, particularly Laing's former colleagues, were initially a little bit suspicious of my motives," says Harris, "but the patients were all very forthcoming. They haven't really had a chance to tell their stories before as most of what has been written about the place concentrates on the incredibly charismatic figure of RD Laing. Nobody else has really had a voice. That is what the book is about in a way, letting the overlooked have their say. Laing is the underlying figure in the project, but it's not about him. He's the dead presence, the long shadow."

Over two years, Harris managed to track down and meet 13 of the reputed 130 people who passed though Kingsley House in the five-year period. Their memories of the place are often impressionistic and contradictory, yet vivid and moving. They are all, to varying degrees, survivors of a radical, some would say irresponsible, moment when everything – even the definition of insanity and, by extension, sanity – seemed up for redefinition.

Pamela Lee: resident, 1967-68

Pamela Lee lived in another community house after leaving Kingsley Hall. She now lives in lives in north London and likes to make ceramic cats in a day class at the Mary Ward Centre

"Pamela was outstanding in a way, [because she was] totally normal," remembers fellow resident Dorothee von Grieff. "She had this bourgeois furniture – it was so ordinary that it was such a contrast." According to Francis Gillet, "she used to live on a bowl of brown rice and miso per day".

I was just 10 when my father died and 17 when my mother died. My sister had left for London. I didn't really have any family at all.

I had such a chaotic time in that period in London: so many addresses – there were 30 places in one year. It wasn't my choice: I just used to get turned out of places. I went to a psychiatric hospital because I had a relationship with this guy I met, a medical student.

He invited me back to his parents' and I think I was very, very nervous at the time – and shy. His parents thought I wasn't very healthy.

I remember walking down the street when I was with him, and I felt on top of the world. I was imagining that all the people must be looking at me, thinking how wonderful and happy I was.

But then it ended, and it was like the end of my life, it was so awful. I went to the doctor's and I said, "Can you send me to a convalescent home, I just can't feed myself", and they sent me to a mental hospital. It was very dictated to you what you could do: I was so disappointed.

I had picked up this book years before – [Laing's] The Divided Self– and I realised that somebody really understood; it was amazing. So I phoned up and got an interview – I think it was in Harley Street – with Ronnie Laing, and he told me about this place [Kingsley Hall].

And that's how I got there. It was like someone actually understood. Yes, I was really very impressed with Ronnie.

I remember that the people around us [local residents] didn't actually like us very much. There was a very negative feeling towards us – not a very good community spirit. We were so isolated from the people around us, because if, they saw us, they would just ignore us. They really didn't like us at all.

I was given some LSD when I was there. I used to smoke cannabis, but the acid I was a bit nervous about. I don't think I actually took it.

I remember we used to eat together. The food wasn't that good, actually.

Francis Gillet: resident 1966-70

Francis Gillet lived in Kingsley Hall as an unmedicated paranoid schizophrenic. Afterwards he lived in various other community houses. He now lives in sheltered accommodation in Oxford

I was a compulsive overdoser. If you showed me a bottle of pills, I'd swallow them all. Part of the problem was – and I've been reflecting on it lately – I was too young. I had too much life to live, and it was going to be so difficult to live it. I saw the road ahead as very long and very difficult, and it was. I mean, now I'm nearly 65, I don't think that way because there isn't so long to go and a lot of the hard work's been done.

At the time I was at Kingsley Hall, the view really was that, if you had schizophrenia, it was no good talking to you because you would never get any sense out of a schizophrenic – it's all nonsense that comes out of their mouths. And I pretty much subscribed to that view. Ronnie [Laing] said, "Go mad, young man", and I did. I took him at his word, and I went as mad as I possibly could, and at no time did he try and stop me.

There were some very crazy people at Kingsley. There was one man who set up the dining table in the upstairs garden area, arranged it all for a dinner party and dressed up in white robes. I woke up one morning and there was the dinner table all laid in the garden and a man in a white robe gabbling to himself.

But I don't think any of them were spotted by neighbours walking on the roof, as I was once. Yeah, [once] I leapt off the roof. I didn't go the full drop. I leapt into a junkyard, which was full of old washing machines and Hoovers and things people had thrown over the wall. I got a crash fracture in my spine that still causes me problems today.

Ronnie used to keep acid in his fridge. It was pure stuff, Sandoz laboratory grade, the real McCoy, and he wasn't shy about sharing it around. He believed it was a kind of spiritual laxative, which I think is probably quite an accurate description of it. And I do remember him handing it to me: I thought, 'This is the apple from the tree of knowledge, and if I take this it's going to be a long road back from where I'm going', but I did take it. Ronnie did believe you would be able to flush demons away with it. I wouldn't disagree, I think it's an interesting thing.

[Then there was] the DMT – Dimethyltryptamine or 'triptamine. It's refined from a plant in the Amazon jungle and we had it shipped in from California in a briefcase. I took it once, and it changed my life for ever. Just once really blew my mind, and I never really thought the same about anything again.

A group of us at the Hall were interested in taking it. As soon as they injected it, we collapsed on to a bed; we couldn't stand up. We were in a small room. I had a vision of myself as a dead Jew being bulldozed into a mass burial pit at Auschwitz. It was an intensely strong experience. It was the end of life, the end of existence. I felt very dead at that point.

[Another time], I remember meeting Sean Connery. He was at the height of his James Bond fame then. He came to a party with Ronnie, and the two of them started Indian wrestling while we stood around and drank. They went on and on wrestling each other in the games room. They decided to see which one was tougher – James Bond or Ronald Laing.

So that was all a wild party, but the next day he turned up at teatime and sat down, had a cup of tea and made it quite clear to us that he had been young once and he hadn't had much himself and he could see himself in us and that kind of thing. He actually came back to thank us for having the party the night before. He was very humble and very nice.

Jutta Laing: resident, 1966-67

Jutta Laing was RD Laing's girlfriend at Kingsley Hall and became his second wife in 1974. They had two sons and a daughter, but divorced in 1988. She now lives in north London where she teaches yoga

I came here because I wanted to get out of Germany. I had five names of people I might contact and I picked out RD Laing at random and called him. He invited me for lunch, and that's how we met. He had left his wife and his children, and, although some people like to believe I took him away from his family, that's not true at all because he had already had a liaison with someone else before me.

I worked freelance – with Gallery Five cards and doing illustrations for Harper's Bazaar– and I did very well, but my life in Kingsley Hall and my life with Ronnie became predominant. It was a run-down place to live in, partly because there were quite a few very psychotic people living there who never washed or cleaned their rooms. Some people used it as a commune. A few hippies gravitated towards the place because it was very cheap to live there. Living there we had very little [free] time; we were always a group of people, maybe three, four, five people, looking after someone who had completely lost it, so they wouldn't harm themselves.

For everyone who lived there, Kingsley Hall was an intense period, and my life with Ronnie was intense in the sense that a lot of people wanted to meet him. There were always visitors from all over the world. Ronnie was one of those people who you either loved or misunderstood. Some people thought he was crazy himself. Hid did drink a lot but he wasn't a drunk. He was exceptionally alive and very charismatic. [The anthropologist] Francis Huxley labelled him a shaman.

It wasn't comfort, Kingsley Hall, that's for sure. But it was an extraordinary group of people. I live a quiet life now and have for quite a long time. I can't say I have found the peace I am looking for.

Dorothee (Dodo): resident, 1966-67

Dorothee von Grieff came to London after finishing art school in Germany to "find herself". She visited and lived in Kingsley Hall for the "experience". An accomplished photographer, she took many pictures while she was there which largely remain unseen (see a selection above). She went on to study Tibetan Buddhism and now lives in north London

I was always looking for something in Germany, in my environment; I couldn't find it. Germany was very controlling always and I rebelled and I didn't want to rebel. I just wanted to live and to be myself. And that was an incredible liberation, that it happened, in a way, so dramatically, it was unexpected.

This incredible freedom in England and then in Kingsley Hall was just mind-boggling. Germany was so backwards: psychology didn't exist or therapy, I mean that was something for loonies.

[At Kingsley Hall] it was open doors and no medication. That was totally revolutionary, that was the whole idea and it was incredible. That was in the Sixties, the big revolution, and for me Ronnie Laing's skill was to hold up the mirror. He was a shaman, he had an incredible gift just to listen, to be in the present, to tune into the other person's world and experience, and I had never met that before.

One memory: Mary Barnes had her room and one bathroom upstairs. When she was in the bath, it sounded like a whale, she had so much fun and made these incredible sounds and the bathwater came schlepping down the steps to her room. She had so much fun and screamed and yeah, it was like a whale and the water was coming down.

It was always quite a special day when she had her baths.

I was a helper: I cooked, I [helped] Jutta. But after a year I started to hear voices. It was hitting me. And then black magic came into the house, this dark energy. It just happened, and it wasn't discussed. It was like a hippopotamus trampling through the house. It was so spooky I can't tell you.

Before Ronnie and Jutta broke up – which was a very, very dramatic time for the whole community – and Ronnie had his breakdown, when everything fell apart – Kingsley Hall had already sort of subsided. But there was usually a continuity of meetings, music, getting together, rebirthing and so on.

[At one point] I came back from a trip to Germany and there was a meeting going on at the house among various members and it seemed to me like everything had broken loose. I mean, Ronnie was furious and roaring like a lion in pain. When Ronnie left that was when the disaster hit, because Ronnie [was] a magician, a shaman and an incredible being. It was a total downer. Ronnie was holding the place together. Such a place can't exist without such a key figure, it can't.

I was introduced to Tibetan Buddhism and [went on to] travel with my Tibetan teacher to Tibet and India. I mean, I couldn't have gone on living in Kingsley Hall. It was 24 hours – it was non-stop and as I told you I was getting loopy.

James Greene: visitor 1966-68; resident 1968-69

James Greene, nephew of the author Graham Greene, was initially a patient of RD Laing. He then started training as a psychoanalyst. Greene informally oversaw the running of Kingsley Hall. He went on to become a translator of Russian poetry and a playwright. He lives in north London

Ronnie helped me to become a therapist. It was totally unorthodox but he didn't believe in formal training for therapists – if he thought you were a suitable person to be a therapist, f*** the training. He didn't believe in the labels, patient versus helper; there was no demarcation. The best thing that one could say about him is that he was a kind of shaman. If he'd stuck to being a shaman, OK, but he was also working officially as a psychoanalyst. You can't really combine these two roles and he was full of contradictions. The people involved with him suffered as a result…

One patient had been in a mental hospital: John Woods, I think. His label in orthodox psychiatry was paranoid schizophrenic. He had some fantasy about some young woman and he couldn't write letters to her himself so he dictated them to me. When it turned out this woman wasn't interested, he assumed wrongly that I was preventing her from coming to visit him. He thought I was a black magician and was controlling her. Then living in there became quite scary. There was a chapel in the building, with a huge crucifix, and he burst into my room early one morning holding it. I thought he was going to attack me with it but he wanted to exorcise me. Eventually, I did something that was against the whole ideology of the place: I tried to have him sectioned.

Book testimonies have been edited for this article.

• The Residents is available as a signed limited edition of 100, or as a £5 digital version for iPhone and iPad, from dominicharris.co.uk. The book and portraits from The Residents are part of the group show Voice of the Grain at Ambika P3, 35 Marylebone Road, London NW1, from 5 to 9 September

This article was amended 4 September 2012 to correct a quotation by R D Laing


guardian.co.uk© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

The residents of Kingsley Hall – in pictures

$
0
0

In 1965, the psychiatrist opened a radical treatment centre in London. Here are some portraits of former residents by Dominic Harris, and images from the time


Turner prize 2012 exhibition review: is this the best one yet?

$
0
0

Immerse yourself in Spartacus Chetwynd's daft performances, Paul Noble's filthy drawings, Elizabeth Price's terrifying video and Luke Fowler's film about schizophrenia

Opening on Tuesday at Tate Britain, the 2012 Turner prize exhibition is one of the most demanding and thoughtful in the award's history. High seriousness and scatological humour, ribald performance, death and despair all play their part.

It also takes the longest to see. Glasgow-based Luke Fowler's 2011 film All Divided Selves, about Scottish psychiatrist, analyst and writer RD Laing, clocks in at 90 minutes. The live and recorded performances by Spartacus Chetwynd and her troupe of collaborators can spin out the day. Elizabeth Price's 20-minute video, The Woolworths Choir of 1979, invites repeat viewing. Paul Noble's drawings are so full of detail and incident they can make you forget lunch. As it is, they can put you off food entirely.

Noble opens the show, with a selection of drawings spanning 16 years. He has created an entire fictive world, based on the imaginary town and environs of Nobson. There are parks, palaces, desert dwellings and gardens, all precisely rendered in pencil, and peopled by perky little turds, pointed at both ends. The world he has created – last shown in an extensive show at London's Gagosian Gallery– is peculiar and original. His humour drives him, and has kept him locked in his studio for nearly two decades. I love the litter of rocks retreating to a far horizon, the filigree railings and wonky modernist buildings, the rain on the water – though all the excrement gets wearying.

Recently Noble announced he was done with Nobson and the years of obsessive graft with a hard pencil. This show is a further recapitulation of this extensive body of work. The interesting thing now is less what he has already achieved, substantial though it is, than what comes next. Noble's recent small and exquisitely carved marble sculptures replay Henry Moore's mother-and-child theme: baby turd sits on Mummy poo's lap. These sculptures aren't nearly so good as Sarah Lucas's writhing, involuted plays on intestinal form, never mind Louise Bourgeois's carvings or, dare I say, the works of Moore himself. Noble's sculptures are just going through the motions.

All Divided Selves is Luke Fowler's third film in a decade about RD Laing. It concerns madness and sanity, among whose cast of troubled minds Laing is revealed as another pursued by demons, and it pithily observes that the definitions of schizophrenia are so all-encompassing – and such a mish-mash – that anyone might be sectioned should a psychiatrist be of a mind to commit them. Along the way we meet distressed schizophrenics, old-school psychiatrists of the drug-'em-and-electroshock-'em regime – Laing's anti-psychiatry colleague David Cooper (who himself went on to have his own crisis) – and Gay Byrne, the Irish TV presenter, who accuses Laing on his chatshow of being drunk. Even Janet Street-Porter gets a fatuous soundbite.

You have to know a bit about Laing, his circle and his times, to follow this. The film is beautifully edited, though you want it to move on. It is the cleverly used archive footage that really fascinates – though not nearly so effectively as similar material did in John Amkomfrah's moving film about the social thinker Stuart Hall, showing at the current Liverpool Biennial. Both works are studies of the construction of identity and the self. Fowler uses his art, and Laing's evident flaws, as a hedge against a more thoroughgoing critique. We keep drifting off into the landscape. There's no doubt Laing was an important and passionate figure, and Fowler casts him as flawed hero. Perhaps he was, but Fowler's work studiously avoids the analytical. Laing's sexual politics, for a start, are never examined.

Elizabeth Price makes every second count in her 20-minute, high-definition video. She also makes much use of archive and internet footage, and digital imagery. To begin with you think you are watching an animated Powerpoint lecture on church architecture. There are descriptions of nave and parclose, rood screen and choir, with animated 3D drawings and still black-and-white close-ups of choir stalls; there are ornaments, medieval beasts, foliage and people. Carved bodies writhe. Suddenly, the 1960s bad-girl band the Shangri-Las come crashing in, and we're lifted by the beats and rhythms as they sing their hit Out on the Street.

Exhilaration suddenly turns to terror. Song becomes scream. The Shangri-Las' finger-snapping is edited to singular effect, as sudden as gunfire. A synchronised dance move, with waving arms, becomes another arm flailing – news footage of a girl at a barred window trying to attract help, in a 1979 fire at a Woolworths department store in Manchester that killed 10 people.

Price's work is controlled down to the last microsecond. She lifts you up and slams you flat. The turn of events becomes genuinely distressing. Throughout the film words and phrases erupt on the screen, or appear as graphic footnotes. There is no spoken commentary, but rather moments of blackness and silence, punchy slogans, and the fire service's own filmed reconstruction of the fire, set among stacks of furniture in an abandoned factory. Pearly smoke fills the screen. This is almost a poem, with its repeated and evolving phrases, the counterpoint of sound, image and words. The texture of the work fits exactly – it is both hot and cold, brittle and brutal, an elegy and a power-pop dance. Price's work has a violent lyricism and an incredibly deadpan restraint. It is so measured it might soon come to look mannered and dated. She is certainly doing something new – but how do you tell the modish from the timely? Will it last? The question won't go away.

Spartacus Chetwynd's art is rumbustious, bonkers, daft and discombobulating. It is like being hit over the head with a pig's bladder. Chetwynd has built two sets for performance in her space. They need her and her co-performers to animate them. On their own, they're a bit dismal, as empty stages always are. Performance is the thing: a puppet show of Jesus and Barabbas, and a further work based on the sprawling Odd Man Out, which Chetwynd first performed last year.

There are living tree-people with root-like appendages, and a dance that teeters on the edge of "I am a tree" new age nonsense but also casts itself as a morality play. It's all mummery and flummery, and conducted with a winning amateurishness. I lay on the floor and a mandrake-root puppet whispered something secret to me about teeth; then I was ushered out by a tree-man.

Chetwynd's troupe remind me of the Austrian performance collective Gelitin. Both draw on the medieval and the carnivalesque. It's a world turned upside down. You can watch further performances on monitors while seated on an overturned, inflatable slide. This galumphing object wheezes and squeaks, and so does Chatwynd's art. Liberating though it is meant to be, there is no catharsis. She wants to free us up, audience and performers alike, but freedom's a fleeting thing.

The death of a Turner prize judge, Michael Stanley, director of Modern Art Oxford, on 21 September casts a shadow over an exhibition concerned with inner and outer worlds, what we have inherited and what we make.

Deciding who should win the prize this year is difficult, and feels a bit pointless. Better to concentrate on the art.

• The Turner prize winner will be announced on 3 December.


guardian.co.uk© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Turner prize 2012: Adrian Searle looks at the shortlist - video

Turner prize 2012 – review

$
0
0

Tate Britain, London

The art shortlisted for the 2012 Turner prize is vivid, intelligent and original, with one dismal exception. And just for once the same can be said of the exhibition itself. For nearly every year there is a discrepancy between the work that excited the judges at some far-flung venue in the previous 12 months and the work the public eventually gets to see in the annual show at Tate Britain, which is often entirely new or very old.

But this time visitors can actually see precisely what excited the panel in the first place – the films of Luke Fowler and Elizabeth Price, Noble's pencil drawings, the performances of Spartacus Chetwynd and crew – and come to their own opinions about the art and, I suppose, the judges themselves. What is more, all of the shortlisted exhibitions took place in Britain and not in Oslo, Zurich or even Los Angeles so there is a good chance that all of the judges actually saw all of the shows, which cannot always have been the case. It feels as if fairness is beginning to dawn over a prize fogged with anomalies.

Paul Noble opens the exhibition with more of his densely detailed drawings of the imaginary metropolis of Nobson Newtown and its surroundings, named (self-mockingly) after their only begetter. Colossal miniatures, so meticulously executed in their every brick and dewdrop that it feels as if one could see everything, near and far, as if in some dream, they are nonetheless melancholy in atmosphere.

What looks like a beautiful prairie is littered with tiny parodies of modernist sculpture. A celestial greenhouse floating on an endless sea turns out to be the site of an ecological disaster. A fabulous house – Paul's Palace– has games in every room; indeed the whole drawing functions like a pinball machine, sending the eye from detail to detail via passages and chutes, but there is nobody home and ominous rocks fill the nearby seashore.

This pencil panorama is a form of autobiography by other means, a commemoration of particular people and places. The air of reverie is heightened by exacting draughtsmanship, then undercut by droll visual humour. This is occasionally crude – I wish he hadn't included recent marble carvings that send up Henry Moore with their cloacal shapes – but after almost 20 years it feels as if Nobson could go on expanding fruitfully in his mind forever.

Noble's drawings are the only still images in this show. Elizabeth Price has a video work, The Woolworths Choir of 1979, that builds so fast and hard it fairly overpowers the viewer. It falls in three acts, each a wordplay on the title – quires of paper, the choir in church architecture, the singing choir – and unites them by syncopating old photographs, archive footage and newsreel to a rhythm of finger-clicks and hand-claps that will eventually burst into song with the Shangri-Las belting out their 60s hit Out in the Streets.

Price has hit on an exhilarating way of merging knowledge with image. She uses words which flick across the screen like terse bulletins, informative but impersonal. You learn about gargoyles and trefoils, and the terrible facts of a fire that killed 10 people at a branch of Woolworths in 1979. But the same words have multiple meanings and registers. "The greatest of expression in the twist of a wrist" begins as a dust-dry comment on medieval effigies but will end up as a devastating elegy.

Over the years Price has whipped words and images together to make each seem newly bizarre. Here she has deeper intentions. The work mounts towards its horrifying climax with a great respect for the dead, but then founders in the chaos, smoke and grief, uncertain how to end. It succeeds as an act of commemoration – once seen, the Woolworths tragedy will never been forgotten – if not quite as a work of art.

Luke Fowler's film about RD Laing and the anti-psychiatry movement is, by contrast, long, slow, diffuse and elusive. It is also absolutely compelling. It begins with the charismatic author ofThe Divided Self expounding his beliefs and travels, all the way to the Laing who released pop records and could still galvanise a television audience when drunk, in the notorious RTE interview with Gay Byrne.

But even to describe the film this way is misleading. For it does not proceed by narrative so much as digression, detail, sudden glimpse and brief dialogue. It is a mass of short scenes and snapshots of the inner workings of medical institutions spliced with footage of the vast life going on outside, as if the world were crowding into the film rather as it crowds into the minds of the people on screen.

People who may or may not be ill: the definition of insanity in the 60s appears shockingly broad; indeed, people who may or may not be psychiatrists themselves. Tense, chain-smoking, garrulous: patients and practitioners, orthodox and unorthodox, can seem so alike.

This is not glib. Even as one begins to perceive Laing in a new light – Fowler isolates moments of compassion, sadness, uncertainty, even fear in his self-aggrandising subject – All Divided Selves also shows the consequences of his doctrines. This is not just the bewilderment and squalor of the Kingsley Hall experiment, but the long-term effects of releasing mentally ill patients to sleep rough and suffer in the community.

Fowler keeps it all in play to the point where one wonders whether the film is dialectical at all, whether it is questioning either Laing or his opponents. Is he the consummate media star or the oppressive figure always present in the background at Kingsley Hall; is he a figure of freedom or not?

It feels as if the film is a parallel experiment, being freeform and unauthored – no rules, no limits, as if there was nobody in charge. But its structure is a measure of its meaning. It builds through all sorts of nuances towards some piercingly sad scenes of hospitalised patients, dosed to stupefaction, whose difficulties are visibly more than mental – poverty, violence, accident, the world crowding in. Their doctors ignore all this in favour of drugs; Laing would have "freed" them.

Spartacus Chetwynd's carnivalesque performances involve awkward people, botched backdrops and hopeless puppets. The curators describe them as "deliberately amateurish", but how can they tell? Nothing in the gyrations of four blokes in painted sheets and smeary camouflage lugging a papier-mache rabbit – reference Beuys's hare – presenting us with a "shaman" suggested that anything could ever have been any better.

Chetwynd must have a following otherwise she would not be here. But the aesthetic is so wilfully cack-handed, the thinking so coarse – bit of Rabelais, bit of Bosch and Beuys, bit of a laugh – that silence is the only polite response.

There is a huge distance between the best and the worst work this year. But consider a fine remark from Penelope Curtis, chair of the judges. "We would find it easier to leave the shortlist as it stands now, the result of many different kinds of work by different kinds of people." How right she is, given that it only represents the different values of a handful of judges as well. Why not forget the old rules at last and split the Turner prize, democratically, four ways?


guardian.co.uk© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Turner prize 2012: Elizabeth Price is a worthy winner in a vintage year

$
0
0

In a strong field, the artist's video dealing with a terrible 1979 fire in Manchester stood out as a painful, complex and honest work

This has been a good year for the Turner prize. All the artists seemed to me to deserve their place here: no clear winner, no obvious losers. But in the end, Elizabeth Price deserved to win, with a 20-minute video that is as finger-clicking and rhythmic – thanks to the music of the Shangri-Las – as it is painful and elegiac, dealing as it does with a catastrophic 1979 fire in a Woolworths department store in Manchester in which 10 people died.

The focus and drive of Price's work, the cutting and the atmosphere, mark her out. There are silences, bursts of music, a terrific play of words and images, and switches in tempo that take us from an analysis of church architecture to a reconstruction of the fire itself by the Manchester authorities. Her use of footage from the fire itself never feels voyeuristic or meritricious. She does a great deal in 20 minutes. Its complexity has stayed with me.

Like Price's, much of Luke Fowler's art depends on the use of archive footage. And like hers, Fowler's work is tough on our emotions, frequently homing in on eccentric and troubled cultural figures. At the Turner prize, he shows his third film about the Glaswegian psychologist and analyst RD Laing. It's a complex film about a complicated man and his legacy, but it loses clarity and drive over 90 minutes.

Paul Noble has been lost in Nobson New Town, creating its architecture, its public spaces and factory zones, its absurdities and monstrosities with nothing more than a pencil and imagination since the mid-1990s. He has created an entire world. But I am less than wholly enamoured with the faecal people who inhabit the town, which he has been sculpting. After his Gagosian show a year ago, for which he was nominated, I wrongly assumed that Noble was done with Nobson, but he assured me last week that he is not. Maybe there's no escape. He should have been nominated at least five years ago. He doesn't need the prize anyway.

Spartacus Chetwynd was probably an unlikely win, but when she and her troupe are performing, the experience can be magical, funny, absurd and anarchic. This was a breath of fresh air for the prize. But when the performers aren't rolling around, performing with clunky marionettes or praying to a mandrake-root oracle, the installations themselves feel a bit dead and empty. I'm glad Price has won.


guardian.co.uk© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Clancy Sigal: A trip to the far side of madness

$
0
0

When Clancy Sigal first met soon-to-be 'celebrity shrink' RD Laing in the 1960s, he was like a breath of fresh air. But then Sigal broke down, and Laing reneged on a solemn promise ...

Scene: a dark shaded consulting room on the ground floor of 21 Wimpole Street, London W1. Time: early 1960s. This is my first session with the up-and- coming "celebrity shrink", Dr Ronald D Laing. I've run through half a dozen therapists who either call me names ("You're unanalysable, dear man") or recommend electroshock therapy (at Maudsley hospital) or advise me to quit writing if it's so painful.

Laing is a breath of fresh air. He is about my age (mid-30s), irreparably handsome with the doomed beauty of a haunted artist, and from a similar slum background. He speaks my language, or so it seems. Later, it turns out he is fashionably downgrading his Presbyterian middle-class origins in Glasgow.

Smoking a thin cigar, he leans forward intently in his cracked-leather chair and examines me through half-lidded eyes. "What are ye fookin' around wi' all that neurotic shit for, Clancy?" he says in a Scottish accent I am to learn he can put on or off at will. "Tummy aches and faintin' spells is crybaby stuff. Ye've got the makings of a good schizophrenic. Lucky ye've come to the right place."

Indeed, I had. And at only six quid a session. Except that I had no idea what a schizophrenic was. Or what I was getting into that would, depending on how you look at it, rob me of the next half-dozen years or give me the experience of a lifetime.

Laing insisted on calling me a "McCarthy refugee", an exile from the House Un-American anti-communist hunters. This was only half true since I'd also run away from my personal demons in the States, a feverish mental disequilibrium that (I realise now) was the compost of my writing. After a long dry spell as an émigré "London Yankee", I was on a writing jag - novels, journalism, pamphlets, BBC talks. But it didn't stop the anxiety attacks.

In his consulting room Laing and I immediately connected. We shared a childhood of psychic and actual violence from our chaotic family histories. Laing liked using military and boxing metaphors; occasionally we even sparred around his room, jabbing, hooking, feinting. I was certainly more at ease with him than the English poets and novelists I met whose limp handshakes were so unmanly ... so un-American.

At the time of our first meeting Laing was on his way to becoming the Bob Dylan of "existential" psychoanalysis with his bestselling book, The Divided Self, a bible for disturbed teenagers. For all its Sartrean chatter - ontological insecurity, being-for-itself, etc - Laing's message was starkly simple: doctors must stop treating mental patients as objects to be done things to, and have the courage to meet patients as equals in an "I-thou encounter". But all that was only his public self. There was another, secret side, he hinted. (I love secrets!) He dared me to pass through his most private and cherished door: the door of perception known as the schizophrenic revolution.

I'd no idea what he was talking about. But if it was a revolution I was all for it. Laing and I were both "politicals" of the leftish type (CND, New Left, all that). And like most people under 40 we were fed up with a moribund Establishment stifling our best energies. A new music (psychedelic rock, the Stones, acid folk, Grateful Dead) and new clothes styles (mod, razor-cut hair, Italian suits) seemed to signal the birth of an "absolute beginners" Britain, vital and violent and more like us.

Laing's ascendant star was perfectly timed. Antonin Artaud's "madness is truth" was all the rage, as was David Mercer's TV play A Suitable Case For Treatment, later a film. The feminist playwright Jane Arden went around chanting, "We are all mad. If you are a woman then you are mad."

Laing's early writing spoke, poetically, from his troubled gut to growing audiences of the disenchanted and mentally unbalanced, including me. He preached that the root of the thing that sickened us was the emotional dysfunction within families encoded in the parents' "double bind" ("Go away but tell me you love me"), and loveless (or overbearingly loving) contradictory communication that drove kids literally mad. In this sense, love itself was the ticking time-bomb of all personal relationships. One struggled to free oneself from the chains of love in order to find a selfhood that might exist only on the other side of madness. Indeed, Laing's unfinished last book was titled The Lies Of Love.

His theatrical genius was to "give psychiatry a human face" - to translate his philosophical interests (Husserl, Jaspers and Kierkegaard) into common street language that spoke to his own experiences as a "policeman" (his word) of other people's mental illnesses in Scottish and British army hospitals where he had worked as an intern. In a quiet rage he told some pretty gory stories that left me in no doubt of his guilt that as a young doctor he had let himself participate in the medical profession's legalised "mind butchery" of their patients. As our relationship deepened it became clear that, for desperate men like us who lived in an amoral Dostoevskian world almost beyond suicide, anything was permissible if it (a) broke a few teeth in the fight for the liberation of the mentally "ill" and (b) brought us closer to the extinction of Ego (we thought in capital letters).

Laing, whom I trusted with my soul, and I crossed the line of professional etiquette when we began exchanging roles, he the patient and I the therapist, and took LSD together in his office and in my Bayswater apartment. Somehow, along the way, we created - with Laing's closest colleagues Dr Aaron Esterson, David Cooper and Sid Briskin - the Philadelphia Association. This was a registered charity dedicated to devising a humane alternative to the "treatment" of the mentally sick that until recently had included insulin coma, heavy drugs and even lobotomy. (Electroshock therapy of the crudest kind was still quite popular in mental hospitals.)

By putting forward our respectable public face and sidetracking our private agenda - going personally crazy - we found and voluntarily staffed Kingsley Hall in east London, which is now celebrating its 30th anniversary. At the time, Kingsley Hall became an international mecca for psycho-tourists, earnest American helpers, celebrities like Tim Leary and Allen Ginsberg ... and a haven for the truly desperate cases whom other doctors had given up on. Any given night you could run into a Beatle on acid or the former mental nurse Mary Barnes (memorialised in a play by David Edgar) daubing shit on the walls of her room.

Then, of course, there were these cursed meetings of the inner circle. I hadn't participated in anything like our Philadelphia Association roundelays of insult-trading since hanging out on Chicago street corners as a teenager. Except that we were grown-ups. Wherever did these "speak bitterness" sessions come from, Mao's China? They were acrid and soul-punishing and, I guess, meant to toughen us for the Long Ascent to the Everest of mental breakdown, our private goal of spiritual rebirth.

Laing and I had sealed a devil's bargain. Although we set out to "cure" schizophrenia, we became schizophrenic in our attitudes to ourselves and to the outside world. Our personal relationships in the Philadelphia Association became increasingly fraught. At the same time - I speak only for myself - the sheer brutality of our interchanges conveyed an unmistakable message: you are already living on the other side of sanity.

It all ended badly ... and well.

From the start Laing and I had made a solemn compact that we would protect each other's back - like Kirk Douglas and Burt Lancaster in Gunfight At The OK Corral - if either of us broke down. "Breaking down" was, of course, an essential precondition for "breaking through" that would finally cure us of the human condition.

I was the first to go, at Kingsley Hall. Proper do it was, too. In front of witnesses. Lost my mind entirely and not a bad feeling. Leaped and danced on the communal supper table, and with an imaginary prayer shawl around my shoulders skipped around wailing an authentic, or gobbledegook, Hebrew prayer. And then it came, the vision I'd been working and longing for. I had to laugh. God, in the shape of (I swear) a railway union organiser, sat me on His knee for some stern advice. Stop being so crazy, He commanded. It's self-indulgent. Go back to your writing and live normally like other folks.

Laing, at the head of the table, had grown alarmed by my behaviour. His anxiety spread to others. That night, after I left Kingsley Hall, several of the doctors, who persuaded themselves that I was suicidal, piled into two cars, sped to my apartment, broke in, and jammed me with needles full of Largactil, a fast-acting sedative used by conventional doctors in mental wards. Led by Laing, they dragged me back to Kingsley Hall where I really did become suicidal. I was enraged: the beating and drugging was such a violation of our code. Now I knew exactly how mental patients felt when the nurses set about them before the doctor stuck in the needle.

Before I could fight back - at least four big guys including Laing were pinning me down - the drug took effect. The last thing I remember saying was, "You bastards don't know what you're doing ..."

They left me alone in an upstairs cubicle overlooking a balcony with a 30ft drop. I had to figure a way to escape from this bunch of do-gooders who had lost their nerve as well as their minds. Fortunately, I had learned some tricks of the madness trade as a "barefoot doctor" in Villa 21, David Cooper's innovative schizophrenic ward at Shenley hospital. Rule Number One, which I had ignored till now: don't make your doctors more anxious than they already are.

Choosing life over death, I put on an act pretending that I had rejoined Laing's obedient flock - which relaxed the doctors' hysteria - and when they were all safely asleep slipped away from the hall back to my flat. For months afterwards I slept with a baseball bat in my bed.

In 1975, 10 years after I broke with Laing, I completed a comic novel, Zone Of The Interior, based on my experiences with schizophrenia. Published to widespread notice in the US, it was stopped cold in Britain by Laing's vague threat of a libel action. Potential publishers backed off. A small independent house offered to publish Zone but reluctantly pulled out when two of its board members, both leftwing, strongly opposed. By then Laing had become something of a sacred cow on the left, a darling and victim of the celebrity culture.

My feelings about Laing have changed over time, especially since his sudden death on a tennis court in southern France in 1989. The problem is there were several RD Laings: doctor, prophet, father and husband, builder and destroyer, personal friend and ultimately my bullyboy. Looking back, I now see that his own "need to be needed" - a capital crime in his rule book - caused him to panic when he believed, for example, that a patient, patron or friend was about to leave him. And, as he taught us, there's nothing scarier than a medical professional who has control over others but not over his own anxiety.

With all its bullshit and doublethink, "Laingianism" tried hard to make a difference. To our credit, we didn't really see much difference between them (patients) and us (healers). We had a go, and some of us paid a price.

Recently I contacted some mental health activists - former patients, family members of patients, psychotherapists, etc. Their verdict is mixed. "The problem with Laing's legacy," one long-time campaigner told me, "is that he produced a competitive and hostile climate where the patient became collateral damage between warring factions". Yet others claim Laing's influence produced modest but real improvement.

A retired psychiatrist testifies, "I was a trainee at the Maudsley in the 1960s and I think [Laing] influenced many [other trainees] to feel closer to patients and to interact more normally with them, rather than in the stilted or 'clinical' way that both psychiatry and psychoanalysis promoted at the time." A more pessimistic therapist speaks only of "cosmetic changes" because the "'biological' view of 'mental illness' rules more supreme than ever". But even he cites "pockets of resistance" that today include Laing- and Esterson-influenced doctors, probation officers, psychologists, who are out there working, quietly, in the field.

"La lutte continue," as the revolutionists say. Yes, ECT is back in vogue. The mind butchers never give up and keep coming back with fancier rationales for doing what they admit they don't understand. The task is as yet undone.

· Zone Of The Interior, by Clancy Sigal, is finally being published in the UK, by Pomona at £9.99


theguardian.com© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Non-fiction: Jan 6

$
0
0

PD Smith, Jo Littler and Vera Rule on The Last Generation | Water Under Threat | Tête-a-Tête | RD Laing: A Life | The House by the Thames and the People Who Lived There

The Last Generation: How Nature Will Take Her Revenge for Climate Change, by Fred Pearce (Eden Project Books, £8.99)

Forget the idea that nature is fragile: "She is strong and packs a serious counterpunch." According to Fred Pearce, nature is about to take revenge for man-made global warming. Civilisation has blossomed in an era of climatic stability, but ours will be the last generation to experience this. The greenhouse gases produced by our carbon-dependent lifestyles have awoken "climatic monsters", and no one knows quite what they will do. We may face mega-droughts and super-hurricanes. The Gulf Stream could switch off, plunging London into Siberian winters. Recent research suggests that when the last ice age ended, 12,000 years ago, temperatures rose dramatically - in under a year. Pearce argues that the climate does not change gradually, but "by sudden drunken lurches". Within a decade we will hit the safe threshold for carbon dioxide; after this we reach terra incognita as far as the climate is concerned. Pearce is a self-proclaimed "sceptical environmentalist" who has been writing about climate change for 18 years, but admits that the current state of the planet "scares" him. It's scary stuff indeed, but well-written and important.
PDS

Water Under Threat, by Larbi Bouguerra, translated by Patrick Camiller (Zed Books, £12.99)

Larbi Bouguerra was born in Tunisia in a house without running water. In his community, water was "a vital substance to be shared ... not [treated as] private property". Although he is a scientist who has researched the problem of pesticides in water, Bouguerra points out that "science does not know everything about this little tri-atomic molecule". He begins by exploring water's symbolism in world culture, from creation myths to modern literature. Among many memorable quotations is this, from the 14th-century Sufi poet Mahmud Shabestri: "If you split the heart of a single drop of water, / One hundred pure oceans flow forth." Much of the book is devoted to current political and economic issues. The way our consumer society treats water clearly angers Bouguerra: making one car consumes 400,000 litres of water; in Brazil, 22 glasses of water are needed to produce one glass of orange juice. Alongside such profligacy, 6,000 children die each day for lack of clean water. The book speaks powerfully of the need to address such inequalities and to relearn what our ancestors knew: that "the water cycle ties us all to one another as well as to Mother Nature".
PDS

Tête-a-Tête: The Lives and Loves of Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir, by Hazel Rowley (Vintage, £8.99)

The existentialism of Simone de Beauvoir and Jean-Paul Sartre understood there to be no pre-existing essence to life: life is what people make of it. So make a lot of it they did, in all kinds of ways, from philosophical inquiry and political campaigning to sexual and emotional experimentation. Sartre and De Beauvoir saw themselves as "two of a kind", with their relationship as primary and all others as secondary, although this was an unstable and inconstant principle. (And for someone whose most famous maxim was "hell is other people", Sartre certainly slept with a lot of them.) Rowley vividly relates the intricacies of their lives, including the less-than-handsome Sartre's penchant for needy young women, De Beauvoir's bisexuality, and her abiding passion for the American novelist Nelson Algren. While it might initially appear to be the tale of two existentialist philosophers packaged into a Mills & Boon narrative, Tête-a-Tête is much more than that, winding the story of Sartre and De Beauvoir's partnership through an intelligent account of their intellectual projects and everyday lives. Completely compelling.
JL

RD Laing: A Life, by Adrian Laing (Sutton Publishing, £8.99)

"If I could turn you on, if I could drive you out of your wretched mind, if I could tell you I would let you know." Erratically brilliant and startlingly inventive, RD Laing threw the core tenets of psychiatry up in the air in his attempts to find new ways to communicate. Influenced by Marx, Buddhism and the existential phenomenology of Sartre, Ronnie Laing came to believe that madness was both an expression of social contradiction and a natural healing process that should be allowed to run its course. Crucial to this process is a change in interpersonal perception: for "what matters most in the patient's environment is the people in it". Laingian treatments involved communal living, experimenting with LSD and rethinking the psychiatrist/patient dynamic. (Confronted with a naked, rocking patient, Laing would strip off and rock alongside them.) Here, his son Adrian outlines his many experiments (sometimes dangerously ramshackle, sometimes profoundly inspired) and paints a vivid picture of how the raucous Glaswegian pisshead in Ronnie constantly battled it out with the acid-infused mystic: Laing as both godlike guru and Daddy Dearest.
JL

The House by the Thames and the People Who Lived There, by Gillian Tindall (Pimlico, £8.99)

Gillian Tindall's microhistory of 49 Bankside, Southwark, London, spooked me; like reading the obituary of someone you loved when young, but never saw thereafter. There it all was again, the disused range in the front kitchen, which overlooked and indeed oversmelt the Thames, and the central dogleg staircase, just as I remember it when the Black family were in boho residence in the last days of old marine and mercantile Southwark - Claire Black found me a home round the corner. Of course Tindall gently erases many of the myths that made No 49 and the surrounding wildernesses of cindered carpark so appealing to me, a Bankside groupie pre-Sam Wanamaker's restoration of the Globe. But that's hardly a loss, since her fresh details add more to the story - the 16th- century pike and perch fishfarm ponds; the faint miasma tainting the air from the early 19th-century holders of the Phoenix Gas Company; and the postwar Peregrine Worsthorne tenancy of the house, when infection-bearing rats swaggered up, piratical, from the cellars.
VR


theguardian.com© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Non-fiction: Jan 7

$
0
0

Jonathan Beckman on RD Laing: A Life | Aesthetics and Politics | Under the Weather | Tete a Tete

RD Laing: A Life by Adrian Laing. Sutton £8.99

Ronnie Laing, author of countercultural textbooks such as The Divided Self and Knots and dabbler in Eastern mysticism, was a man whose keen intelligence only provoked shriller accusations of charlatanism. He shook up the genteel world of London psychoanalysis by providing therapy with a philosophical purpose, through his reading of phenomenological and existential works. RD Laing fathered the author of this book in his first marriage, though after the divorce, Adrian had barely any contact with his father. Adrian's biography is workmanlike, but he throws away his trump card by refusing to discuss his relationship with his father, an investigation that would have been all the more interesting in the context of RD Laing's long-standing interest in the psychodynamics of families.

Aesthetics and Politics by Theodor Adorno, Walter Benjamin, Ernst Bloch, Bertolt Brecht, Georg Lukacs. Verso £6.99

There is nothing Marxists enjoy more than a good squabble. This collection brings together some of the most impassioned debates among mostly German Marxists from the first half of the 20th century. For those of us who believe good art doesn't need to be made with one eye towards the advancement of socialism, these discussions will appear to have got lost on the way to the ball game. I was torn between laughter and despair when the introduction to one of the sections declared, without a smidgen of irony, that Georg Lukacs's lack of interest in the individual work of art was 'the notorious blind spot' in his criticism. None the less, there is an excellent essay by Theodor Adorno on Bertolt Brecht, and extracts from the correspondence between Adorno and Walter Benjamin illuminate their close but fraught relationship.

Under the Weather byTom Fort. Arrow £7.99

The weather holds a curious fascination for the British public that never diminishes, despite the banality of the topic. Tom Fort, whose previous works include a social history of lawns and a book about eels, has written a genial guide to our long-standing interest in the weather. He travels round the country in search of places of meteorological interest, a thankless task given the capricious nature of the British climate. We hear of characters such as William Merle, a 14th-century rector, whose devotion to recording the variations in local wind speed almost certainly exceeded his devotion to his Lord. Despite some incontinent harrumphings against the political reaction to climate change, this is a light and charming read that will add anecdotal spice to any idle chitchat about the prospects of rain.

Tete a Tete by Hazel Rowley. Vintage £8.99

Hazel Rowley prefaces Tete a Tete by claiming to have written not a biography of Sartre and de Beauvoir but a portrait of the philosophers and life partners 'close up, in their most intimate moments'. Sartre, de Beauvoir and the lovers whom they often shared are certainly captured with unsparing scrutiny. Sartre emerges as callous and manipulative of de Beauvoir and girlfriends alike. Nevertheless, Rowley's touching descriptions of the philosophers' early encounters and of their continuing devotion to each other suggest a strong bond, if not of love, then of deep friendship and mutual dependence. Later, Rowley stops giving this bond enough attention and in the course of Tete a Tete Sartre and de Beauvoir share fewer intimate moments, so the focus jerks from one to the other as they make guest appearances in each other's lives.


theguardian.com© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Elizabeth Day and Graham Keeley on RD Laing and the tragic death of his son

$
0
0

He was a pioneering psychiatrist who blamed parents for the psychological problems of their offspring. But as a father, RD Laing was depressed, alcoholic and often cruel. What would he have made of the latest tragedy to hit his own family - the death 12 days ago of his son, Adam?

Before speaking, Adrian Laing takes a small, precise sip of his cappuccino and carefully wipes away the specks of froth from his top lip. 'When people ask me what it was like to be RD Laing's son,' he says, 'I tell them it was a crock of shit.' He laughs, shaking his head.

The question of what it was like to be the child of one of the 20th century's most influential psychotherapists has been playing on Adrian's mind of late. 'It was ironic that my father became well-known as a family psychiatrist,' he says, 'when, in the meantime, he had nothing to do with his own family.'

As Adrian speaks in a modest north London cafe near his Highgate home, the same paradox is being pondered by a handful of mourners gathering a thousand miles south on the Balearic island of Formentera. It was here, on this windswept rocky outcrop, that the decomposed body of Adrian's half-brother, Adam, was found by police 12 days ago. Adam, RD Laing's oldest son from his second marriage, was discovered in a tent pitched on private land, the floor scattered with the detritus of a drunken night. Next to him lay a discarded vodka bottle and an almost-empty bottle of wine.

Initial police reports suggested that Adam, 41, had taken drugs and might have been on a suicidal binge following the end of his relationship with a long-term girlfriend, Janina, earlier this year. The post-mortem found that Adam, a tall, well-built and seemingly healthy man, died of a heart attack.

Conjecture about his death continued, rumours swirling around the beachside bars and restaurants of the island. There was talk of Adam's partying lifestyle, his free-spirited take on life and his occasional bouts of depression and heavy drinking. Over the last few years he had made a haphazard living skippering yachts for day-trippers or as an odd-job man in the quiet winter months. He was a regular at the Bar es Cap, where owner Mariano Mayans remembers him as 'a good man who liked his drink but could handle it.' A sailor at heart, Adam had crossed the Atlantic 11 times and was, by all accounts, a restless soul.

'He was a bit wild but a good guy,' says Nicholas Scherr, who moors a yacht on the island. 'He needed the challenge of the ocean.' Adrian adds: 'Adam found his own way in life. He was a lovely guy and it was a shock to hear of his death. I think it will take some time to sink in.'

Friends say he had grown melancholic since his separation from Janina, a German diving instructor, at the end of last year. He moved out of the house they shared in Cap de Barberia, a tranquil corner away from the tourist beaches. At first he looked after Scherr's yacht in the port of La Savina, sleeping on the boat. Then, a month ago, in an increasingly fragile state of mind, he erected a tent in a wooded area near Janina's home, on private land owned by a British couple he knew. It was here that his body was found, in an isolated field far away from home, accessible only by criss-crossing dusty tracks. It was a lonely way to end a life.

'I think he was depressed before he died,' says shipwright Jorge Agusti. 'He had split up with his girlfriend of four or five years and he had no work organised. He was not short of money but he was saying he was ready to leave. Adam was at the point of packing his bags.

'He liked to drink but he could take it. I saw him a few days before his body was found, and we went on drinking into the night. He seemed all right at the end.'

But Adam was not all right and, despite his outgoing demeanour, had not been for some time. 'I think Adam caught the depressive mood from his father,' says the psychotherapist Theodor Itten, a former student of RD Laing who later became a close family friend. Dr Itten says the break-up of his parents' marriage - Adam's mother, Jutta, separated from Laing in 1981 - affected him badly. 'When he was 13, 14, 15, he was rebellious, he dropped out of school. I think that was a very sad period of time for Adam. He tried to soothe it with smoking, sometimes with drugs and with drinking as a sort of self-medication.

'His death came as a shock. I sometimes wondered if he would get lost on one of his travels on the ocean or break his neck skiing down a wild mountainside. He was a very adventurous young man. Whatever the circumstances [of his death], perhaps he didn't have enough energy or power in him to deal with life.'

Many of Adam's friends on the island he made his home had no idea who his father was. 'He never talked about him,' says Hector Puig, 47, a handyman. If they had known, they might have been struck by the horrible irony that one of Ronald David Laing's lasting contributions to psychiatry in the 1960s and 70s was linking mental distress to a dysfunctional family upbringing. 'From the moment of birth [...],' Laing wrote in 1967, 'the baby is subjected to these forces of violence, called love, as its mother and father have been, and their parents and their parents before them. These forces are mainly concerned with destroying most of its potentialities. This enterprise is on the whole successful.'

Laing theorised that insanity could be understood as a reaction to the divided self. Instead of arising as a purely medical disease, schizophrenia was thus the result of wrestling with two identities: the identity defined for us by our families and our authentic identity, as we experience ourselves to be. When the two are fundamentally different, it triggers an internal fracturing of the self.

His theories overturned the prevailing orthodoxy of the day that mental illness was, as the German psychiatrist Karl Jaspers had put it, 'un-understandable'. He became a countercultural guru in the Sixties and Seventies, attracting a large anti-establishment following who admired his anarchic and individualist philosophies. Laing believed that mental illness was a sane response to an insane world and that a psychiatrist had a duty to communicate empathetically with patients. Once, when faced with a naked schizophrenic woman rocking silently to and fro in a padded cell, Laing took off his own clothes and sat next to her, rocking to the same rhythm until she spoke for the first time in months.

As a psychiatrist, both brilliant and unconventional, RD Laing pioneered the humane treatment of the mentally ill. But as a father, clinically depressed and alcoholic, he bequeathed his 10 children and his two wives a more chequered legacy.

This was partly a blighted genetic inheritance - Laing died, as did Adam, of a heart attack while playing tennis at the age of 61. He, too, struggled with drink and drugs, experimenting with LSD in his later years after being influenced by the work of the psychedelic drug pioneer Timothy Leary. But mostly, it was the result of an absorption in his work so total that he could be guilty of breath-taking callousness and seeming hypocrisy towards his own children. Adrian, 50, Laing's second eldest son, sees it like this: 'Anyone who has become deliberately well-known, inevitably they've done that at the expense of their family. They've gone their own way. They can't do both.'

According to his friends, colleagues and relatives, Laing was frequently unable to extend the compassion he felt for his patients to his own family. His children were left to grapple with their demons. Sometimes, as with Adam, it came with tragic consequences. For all his professional benevolence, Laing was a flawed parent. He, too, was capable of unleashing 'these forces of violence called love'.

Ronald Laing was five when his parents told him Santa Claus did not exist. He never forgave them, claiming in later years that the realisation they had been lying to him triggered his first existential crisis. For the rest of his life, his childhood memories were bleak. He told interviewers of an emotionally deprived upbringing in the Govanhill area of Glasgow, with a disciplinarian mother who broke his favourite toys when he became too attached to them.

His background left Laing with an abiding antipathy towards the nuclear family. By the time of his death he had fathered six sons and four daughters with four women over a period of 36 years. 'I think his reputation took some blows in terms of the way he died, leaving behind 10 children and looking like an irresponsible father,' says Adrian, the youngest of five children Laing had with his first wife, Anne. 'There was an enormous backlash then from families who thought he was blaming them for their children's mental illness.'

His own family was the first casualty of Laing's increasing celebrity. The reissuing in 1965 of his most famous work, The Divided Self, led to frequent television and radio appearances. In many ways his existentialist approach - he believed that social 'sanity' was fabricated by mutual consent; that the mentally ill were as fully human as the medics who were classifying them - captured the countercultural zeitgeist of the 1960s. His radical rejection of convention ensured he became the most famous cult psychiatrist in the country. Charismatic, darkly handsome and possessed of an innate sharpness of mind, he soon embarked on several extra-marital affairs, spending weeks and months away from the family home in northwest London. Anne was left behind, treading water in the wake of his success. The marriage finally came to a juddering halt in 1967, by which time, says Adrian, 'my mother had totally lost it. She found it so humiliating because he was becoming so well-known but he wasn't living with us.'

Laing had already started an affair with Jutta Werner, a German graphic designer who would become his second wife. Despite his burgeoning career, he paid only the legal minimum in child maintenance to his first family. 'He adopted an "out of sight, out of mind" mentality,' says Adrian, who started taking odd jobs aged 13 to contribute to the family income. 'In my mind, he confused liberalism with neglect. My mother was furious about it. She had an unfathomable amount of resentment. Her expression for him was "the square root of nothing".'

Laing would disappear for months on end, forgetting birthdays before turning up in a blizzard of misdirected anger. In a 1994 biography he wrote of his father, Adrian recounts one of Laing's rare visits to their new home in Glasgow when, having argued with Jutta, he took out his anger by beating his daughter, Karen.

He was an unpredictable, occasionally frenzied, father figure who acted with little regard for the consequences. When, in 1975, his second eldest child, Susan, was diagnosed with terminal monoblastic leukaemia, a row broke out between her parents. Anne felt it would be kinder not to tell Susan the diagnosis. Laing disagreed. In the face of fierce opposition from Anne, Susan's fiancé and her doctors, he insisted on travelling to the hospital to inform her that, in all likelihood, she would not live beyond her 21st birthday.

'That was the worst thing,' says Adrian. 'My mother just went potty. She said he was going to rot in hell for that. Then, after he told Susie, he went back to London and left us to deal with it. My mother was spitting blood.'

Susie died, aged 21, in March 1976. 'My father was riddled with guilt about it. He would have been aware of the statistics that demonstrate there is a higher chance of dying from that particular disease if you are from a broken family.'

A year later, Laing's eldest child, Fiona, had a nervous breakdown and was taken to Gartnavel Mental Hospital, Glasgow. Anxious that she should not be subjected to the brutal electric shock treatment and impersonal medical examinations that Laing so detested, Adrian called on his father for advice.

'I was really upset. I asked, "What the fuck are you going to do about it?"' Adrian pauses. A curious smile curls at the corner of his lips. 'At the time we were living in a house called Ruskin Place, and his response was: "Gartnavel or Ruskin Place, what's the fucking difference?" It was a double-bind, you see. Either he had nothing to do with it [Fiona's breakdown] and his theories were shit, or he had everything to do with it and he was shit.'

But how on earth could RD Laing, the celebrated psychiatrist whose entire reputation rested on his theories espousing the compassionate treatment of the mentally ill, reconcile his professional position with his personal behaviour? How could he empathise so profoundly with a naked, rocking schizophrenic patient he had never met and yet fail so spectacularly to do the same with his own daughter?

Adrian leans forward, resting his elbows on the stainless steel cafe table. 'In terms of how he rationalised it... erm... I'm not sure that... I don't think my father felt he was the cause [of the breakdown] so he wouldn't feel it was hypocritical.'

Later he tells a revealing story about Susan being interviewed in 1974 by a journalist writing a feature on the children of famous people. The piece ended with a memorable quote from her: 'He can solve everybody else's problems but not our own.'

The Hungarian psychiatrist Thomas Szasz puts it a different way. Laing, he wrote in 2004, displayed 'an avoidance of responsibility for his first family, indefensible since his line had been that the breakdown of children could be attributed to parents and families.'

But Laing seemed to mellow with the passing of the years. To his second family with Jutta - Natasha, now 38, Max, 32, and Adam - and to his two youngest children with different women - Benjamin, 23, and Charles, 20 - he proved a more kindly father. Adrian was gradually reconciled with him over the years, coming to stay with his half-siblings when he studied for his bar exams in London. 'Ronnie was clear, kind, warm-hearted and sagacious,' says Theodor Itten, who knew him in this later period. 'He was very gentle with his family. Once he told me that in his first family he had hit his children because he didn't know any better. I was surprised because I always thought Ronnie had been the Ronnie I knew, very playful and comforting as a father.'

Many of Laing's friends and colleagues speak of his extraordinary intuition and say he could read people with disarming precision. When sober, it was a talent that could reap rewards by winning someone's trust, whether a girlfriend or a patient. 'He had the gift of being open, of being honest,' says Sue Sünkel, 57, the German-born psychotherapist who gave birth to Laing's ninth child, Benjamin, in 1984. 'I'd never met anybody like him. He didn't feel the need to fix you. He wasn't afraid of people's pain; he was open to it and open to his own.'

But in his later years, as he became more dependent on alcohol and drugs, his judgment was blunted. When he was drunk Laing could exploit the fault-lines in someone's personality with a vicious cruelty. One of his students, Francis Huxley, once said that Laing's words could act like 'a psychic fist hitting the navel of insincerity'.

'My father was deeply intuitive and could make you feel you were talking rubbish just by looking at you,' says Adrian. 'It was very unnerving. He could pick up every nuance of your gestures and body language. When he was drunk he would rant and rave and it felt quite dangerous. He could be emotionally vicious. If he thought I was talking rubbish, his favourite expressions would be "psychotic" or "offensive", and I would say "Why don't you just say you disagree with me, Dad?" It was just so tiring. He was such a heavy drinker and I watched his second marriage disintegrate. Jutta would plead with him and say, "Where are you going to be in five years?"'

In 1987 Laing was forced to withdraw his name from the General Medical Council's medical register after a patient accused him of drunkenness and physical assault (the complaint was later withdrawn). He began to hold 'rebirthing' sessions and took spiritual pilgrimages to Sri Lanka and India. Much of his later work was erratic, crude in tone and increasingly discredited by mainstream psychiatry. 'The general view of Laing's theories within psychiatry is that they are the product of a wild, utopian, romantic imagination - or interesting as museum artefacts but of no contemporary relevance,' says Daniel Burston, author of The Wing of Madness: The Life and Work of RD Laing. 'The view outside psychiatry is more complex.'

What about the view of Laing's own family? Does Adrian believe the drunken disintegration of his father had a lasting effect on Laing's children? 'I think the entire family is a paradigm of cause and effect,' he says bluntly. 'With Adam... there's a sense in which... some people, if their father's an alcoholic, will turn into alcoholics themselves. After my father and Jutta sold the family home, that was when he really found himself on his own, at a relatively young age. He wore his heart on his sleeve. He never had children, he had girlfriends and there was never that much time between them. I would have liked to have seen him happy, settled with kids, but he just didn't like being tied down. He liked to feel free.' He trails off. 'It's a pity we didn't get the last episode of that story.'

Adrian says he has now made his peace with the infamous RD Laing, especially since becoming a parent himself (he has five children). In his biography of his father, Adrian drily notes that his relationship with him 'has improved greatly since his death'. 'I'm very relaxed about him now,' he says. 'I had enough occasions before he died to let him have it. We were friends.'

For all his inconsistencies, there is little doubt that Laing loved his children, in spite of the flawed manner in which he expressed it. In one of his later works, The Facts of Life, Laing wrote: 'Whether life is worth living depends for me on whether there is love in life.'

As Jutta and her two surviving children paid their last respects to Adam at a private cremation on Friday, perhaps they remembered the essence of these words. Perhaps they recalled the Janus-like brilliance of their late husband and father, his gentleness and his wildness; his charismatic charm and his unpredictability; the sharpness of his thoughts, and the drunkenness that blurred them.

Today they will scatter Adam's ashes over the ocean he knew so well. Despite his chaotic life, Adam Laing did have his family's love. Perhaps his father might have judged it a life 'worth living'.

Shrink wrapped: The life of RD Laing

Personal Life

· Born Ronald David Laing, 7 October 1927 in Glasgow.

· Studied medicine at Glasgow University.

· Fathered 10 children by four women.

· Died of a heart attack on 23 August 1989 while playing tennis in St Tropez, France.

Theories

·Laing helped popularise psychology detailing various forms of madness in The Divided Self (1960)

· Attributing schizophrenia to bad parenting is Laing's most criticised idea, put forward in Sanity, Madness and the Family (1964).

· In The Politics of Experience (1967) Laing argued that it is not people who are mad, but the world.

Controversies

· Took LSD with patients and drank heavily.

· Forced to withdraw from the medical register of the General Medical Council in 1987 after an accusation of drunkenness and assault.
Katie Toms


theguardian.com© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Students wave placards and I'm haunted by the ghosts of demos past

$
0
0

Fielding remembers when teachers – inspired by Allen Ginsberg, RD Laing and Jimi Hendrix – were going to change the world and save the working class

I walk down the streets of Bloomsbury. I'm returning to some ancient haunts. I learned to be a teacher around these parts. Ho hum.

I did my PGCE round here at the Institute of Education in 1967 – the Summer of Love.

I get to Senate House. Haggard students queue for gruel and wave placards about their next futile demo. I smile at them. That was me so long ago.

I pass lecture halls and hear the ghosts of Basil Bernstein talking of Restricted and Elaborate codes and Harold Rosen having major insights about language and class. Pedagogical giants.

The Institute was the most intellectually charged place I've ever known. We were knee deep in Foucault and Lacan and RD Laing, and once Allen Ginsberg took his clothes off and went "om!" and cursed Moloch.

Vertiginous stuff. Sexy, incomprehensible, countercultural – and probably in the vicinity of complete bollocks.

I cross to Russell Square. Falling, burnished light dances on skeletal trees.

Ah, the same trees where I decided to be a teacher. Just there. The very spot! I'd just smoked some dope and seen Jimi Hendrix live and gazed like a clot on blossoms that frolicked in the spring moonlight.

Nothing could ever be the same again. Bliss it was to be alive, to be a teacher was very heaven. We were the storm troopers of Albion, we were going to change the world and save the working class.

I charged in on my first teaching practice and set fire to newspaper to the tune of The Crazy World of Arthur Brown.

"Create! Create! Poems about fire gods!" I yelled.

"Fuck off, hippy!" replied the NF boys of the Abbey Wood estate as I snuffed out the flames with my M&S desert boots. Happy times.

I honed this pedagogy over the years – threw in a bit of class management. For a few years, things were great. Then, wallop. 1979. Thatcher. We were The Enemy Within. We plodded on. It was still fun.

Then, wallop. 1988. The National Curriculum. Things shrank and got all corporate. Many of my teaching chums went doollaly and took to the booze, or beta-blockers, and were culled by barbarous managements. Decent and honourable, they are exiles in their own country.

Modern teachers must be so professional, so organised, so quiescent to deliver so brilliantly a syllabus in which they surely can't believe. I'd like to think they've had enough – like these students in this lovely, burnished park.

They haven't a hope against the media, Murdoch and Ginsberg's Moloch. But so what? I'm on their side.

I could well pop along to the demonstration. Dotards and students unite!

Michele Hanson's friend Fielding is a hip dotard who taught English for 35 years in inner-city comprehensives


theguardian.com© 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Viewing all 64 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images